Shit. I mean, the cameras themselves. They might be in a hardened case, but once you extract it, it’s probably some off-the-shelf webcam and a Raspberry Pi with a cellular or maybe even WiFi module.
I’m certain they’d figure out new books to throw at you. How dare you interfere with the surveillance state?
Anyhoo, I’m too old to be wearing a V mask and burgling such devices. Neither do I live in that town, or that country. Or, on that side of the world. No, it’s up to other brave defenders to fight that battle; I’ve got my hands full trying to prevent my own country from turning into a full-on dictatorship.
PS oh! And WRT to cost, a $400 hammer is still a hammer. Having a fancy plastic shell doesn’t mean the guts aren’t off Alibaba. Or have you dismantled one yourself?
“The arrest figure from across the weekend shows that the messaging in the lead up to the event, and the policing during it, were effective in deterring criminal activity…"
Police state surveillance is, by its own perverse motives, self justifying. Among the many thousands in attendance only a couple arrests were made with its help, and so “it was a powerful deterrent!” If it caught many more, then we’d hear them crow about that. If it made false positives, then additional spending would be called for to improve the systems.
Once the money is spent and the people have submitted to be passively datamined, there’s no possible result, other than firm protest, that would call the practice into question. Sadly we are too used to surveillance.
On a related note, I suspect there would’ve been more protests and revolution attempts than we’ve heard about, had the state not already held a monopoly on surveillance, psychology and violence. It’s a trivial matter for an entity possessing all three of those things to break up an emerging protest or revolution that threatens its power.
bedfordindependent.co.uk
Active