There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

@cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone cover

cqst

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

cqst ,

they don’t poison the region.

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/3be24685-7577-46a6-ac83-9f83c05d0b3f.webp

Does this look poisoned to you?

bbc.com/…/20190701-why-plants-survived-chernobyls…

cqst ,

with the incredible advancements in solar and wind it’s no longer the best option.

I haven’t heard of any advancement that makes solar generate energy when the sun doesn’t shine and wind generate energy when the wind isn’t blowing.

cqst , (edited )

They can never accidently summon centuries of nuclear winter.

Neither can nuclear power plants, lol. Nuclear power plants are not built in a way that can trigger a nuclear bomb explosion, which is inherent to the theory of nuclear winter of nuclear explosions leaving material in the atmosphere to blot out the sun.

Maintaining a fission reaction is an incredibly complicated process that requires human intervention to sustain. If nuclear plants fell into “disrepair” the would just turn off and be useless, like windmills.

cqst ,

100% renew

en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_countries_by_renewable…

All the countries that manage 100% renewable power use high levels of hydropower. Which is not an option for many countries and has it’s own ecological problems associated with it.

Also, these 100% renewable countries have very little electricity requirements.

eia.gov/…/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capaci…

The United States produces at least produces four million Gigawatt hours of electricity per year. Compare that to some of these “100% renewable” countries.

cqst ,

It having an inconclusive effect on wildlife, but wildlife clearly being able to survive in the region, doesn’t really detract from what I originally thought.

From the article you linked:

“No matter what the consequences of lingering radiation might be, there were massive benefits to people leaving.”

cqst ,

You can’t overproduce electricity. You have to match the load.

cqst ,

Yes, but the originally free/libre licensed source code is still out there.

makes improvements and put’s those under a proprietary license

You could also make improvements and release them under a GPL license.

cqst ,

Sadly, you should feel alienated. When you choose to use proprietary software, you further the injustice that it creates over society. Windows is so shamefully harmful, even outside of just being proprietary that choosing it in 2024 is choosing the side of unjust power, and you should be rightfully alienated for making that decision.

cqst ,

Maybe political repression and the mass killing of protestors and the internment of ethnic minorities has very little to do with a countries mode of production. Maybe you guys can advocate for an alternative mode of production without defending genocide and using the military to crack down on protests? And maybe liberals can do the same when Western Capitalist Countries do it?

please… :(

cqst ,

If nuclear waste DID pollute water, it would still help combat climate change, specifically the warming of the earth. It doesn’t pollute water, and nuclear waste can be stored deep underground or reused. But we are out of time to find a “perfect solution” nuclear power is the ONLY option to provide renewable and carbon neutral base load power that other forms of “green electricity” will NEVER be able to compete with.

It’s coal or nukes. You better figure out which one you want fast.

cqst ,

No democrat should ever vote to leave this bigot in the succession line to the presidency.

Some fun things Mike Johnson has done:

Called us a “depraved culture” for having high LGBTQ identification:

vanityfair.com/…/mike-johnson-america-depraved-hi…

Made his daughter pledge her virginity to him at a “purity ball”:

abcnews.go.com/US/…/story?id=105785626

And just read what he has to say about gay marriage:

www.newspapers.com/article/…/134019997/

cqst ,

Except that he remains 3rd in line to the presidency, has massive power over how the house is run and so would just backstab democrats after any “deal?”

There is two paths, we can either have a compromise speaker who isn’t Mike Johnson, or Jeffries, without massive concessions (not just floor time, actual policy concessions) it makes no sense for democrats to save Johnson from his own party.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •