There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Smirk

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Smirk , to lemmyshitpost in 5 feet apart = Not gay

You have a strange idea of what “the loop” is.

And you have no idea, keep up.

Just say “all the time” if your memory is that bad mate.

Smirk , to lemmyshitpost in 5 feet apart = Not gay

Aside from this, you out the loop a lot?

Smirk , (edited ) to lemmyshitpost in Time to grow up.

You’ll just never know. Others will. Move on. Be better X

Smirk , to lemmyshitpost in Time to grow up.

…because I’m accusing you of speaking incoherently?

If that’s what you believe, that’s OK.

Instead of just insulting me, why don’t you try harder to explain what you mean?

Sorry if you feel I insulted you…? You’re trying to have a debate here, I’m not. That’s it. Get over it, move on with your life. Or keep me in your head rent free idm. If you can’t read between the lines, and see the bigger picture, there are future vegans that will see, and then act, as I did.

Whatever your goal, you either know what you’re doing, or don’t, isn’t my concern, and it’s apparant from the off that your anti vegan stance comes before anything worth responding to. That’s why my engagement with you is low. Others will see through it (intended or not).

If you need to feel the thrill of a win, here you go.

You’d actually make a brilliant case study on anti vegan rhetoric ngl.

Here’s my disengagement kiss. X

Smirk , to lemmyshitpost in Time to grow up.

At this point I think you’re either an anti vegan bot/troll, an animal agriculture shill, or just someone so enraptured in the decision they’ve made, before ever really thinking, that I genuinely feel sorry about what got you to this point.

You’d made your mind up ages ago, yet you’re still looking for my attention… So yeah, either bot/troll, shill, or dogmatic to the point you’re blind to how you come across.

Peace.

Smirk , to lemmyshitpost in Time to grow up.

You said it yourself, but yeah you do misunderstand.

Like I said it’s not meant for people like you. It’s meant for people who I don’t need to convince that what we unnecessarily do is wrong, you’ll feel it if you have the empathy, and that’s entirely on you and your morality bro.

The people this will reach and make think, will tell people what needs to be done, and even when they know, and don’t want to do it because irrelevant reasons, they STILL do what needs to be done, because compassion.

If you don’t get it, it’s OK! It’s not meant to “be got” by you.

Take care, try be better bro x

Smirk , to lemmyshitpost in Time to grow up.

Fail mate, go watch any number of exposé’s.

Chalked it up to “horrific soundbytes” lmao, got your head buried in the sand pal.

Miss me with your lack of compassion.

Smirk , to lemmyshitpost in Time to grow up.

It’s not meant for you. I can assume it’s meant for people whom it does bother, and also don’t know.

Smirk , to memes in These labels mean much less than you'd think

Nothing of value to add?

Peace.

Smirk , to memes in These labels mean much less than you'd think

And you still support animal abuse when you don’t have to.

Take care, and try and lead a better life mate.

Smirk , to memes in These labels mean much less than you'd think

It’s OK. Your veiled attempt at good faith discussion is textbook, so was expected.

It’s not my goal to make YOU individually vegan. Others can read and evaluate my reasoning, and by extension, the lack of yours.

Smirk , to memes in These labels mean much less than you'd think

I advocate for widespread prolonged de-use and eventually abolition of animals as objects in societies that don’t need to.

What you’ve amounted to saying is “if the world can’t be 100% vegan, why try?”

Let’s try this then-

Me: “respect women”

Misogynist: “You realize we don’t want to do that, and aren’t going to, right?

Unless both you and I agree on regulation, misogyny will continue uncontested.

I think we need better regulation, do you? Are you willing to accept that I won’t become a feminist, and take the compromise of continued sexism with strict punishment for female abuse?”

Or this one’s good-

Me: “don’t be racist”

Racist: “You realize we don’t want to do that, and aren’t going to, right?

Unless both you and I agree on regulation, racist will continue uncontested.

I think we need better regulation, do you? Are you willing to accept that I won’t become a non-racist, and take the compromise of continued racism with strict punishment for lynching?”

If the feminist movement met up against people saying what you’re saying, what do you think their response would be?

And similarly, what would MLK say to you?

No, before you call out my comparison, I’m not comparing racism to sexism to animal abuse. I’m comparing the rhetoric used to defend the acts themselves. And it’s awfully similar.

In summation; I choose consistency in my morality, based on this: if the topic is different, but my rhetoric to justify is the same, check my biases.

People are just simply inconsistent with their justifications, mainly due to detachment from the reality.

Smirk , to memes in Stay in school

Not worth my time.

Please try and lead a better life.

Smirk , to memes in These labels mean much less than you'd think

But what good is worrying?

Become vegan and actually act.

Smirk , to nostupidquestions in What's up with "whinging"?

“But then you wouldn’t get all worked up about it”

READ: “You’re right”

Take care mate, it’s only a post. Peace

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •