I take one of these drugs, Farxiga - I’m diabetic. It’s listed here at $556 a box, I was paying almost $400 a month as my insurance copay in the states. Six months ago I moved to Portugal and here in the European Union it costs me 7 euros to fill that same prescription for 90 days. And that’s through the Public Health Service; I don’t have private health care at all!
“Al het blauw van de hemel” van Mélissa Da Costa. Wat een mooi en indrukwekkend boek! Ik vind het zó jammer dat ik het uit heb.
“Al het blauw van de hemel zal bij een aantal lezers zeker een gevoel van leegte achterlaten, waarin het moeilijk is om weer over te stappen naar een volgend verhaal.”
@stippel66 Het "chicklit" veroorzaakte bij mij meteen gruwelijk jeuk. Maar dat een aanbeveling van jou komt, dat geeft stof tot nadenken. Ik heb het boek aan mijn lijst toegevoegd. Dankjewel voor de tip. 👍
Tip: voeg #boek en @boeken toe. Daar maak je nog meer mensen blij mee. 😊
Exactly. Channel surfing sucks, and every time I go to a hotel or something, I go straight to the TV guide so I don’t have to search for something to watch, and most of the time I give up.
There is A LOT OF ACTION right now as the tech industry, insurance
companies, governments, and major health systems cast about trying to
figure out how to lower costs and/or provide better services to mental
health clients.
*We REALLY need our professional associations watching all of this.
*
As I read these articles I see benefits, yet I see opportunities for:
Misunderstandings of how mental health actually works,
Turning therapists into plug and play component cogs in large machines.
With regards to this particular article, I have questions/issues:
I see the value of using AI for triage to determine who needs to be seen
more quickly. What I don't understand is how this works after the
initial intake. It's almost like the CEO being interviewed sees the
entire therapy process as akin to an Emergency Room intake process.
Does he think therapists are plug and play with a different one assigned
each session? Or is he only discussing psychiatrists (and that is bad
too)? Does he think there is no such thing as regular weekly sessions
and you can just switch times and days around constantly by AI
needs-assessment algorithms?
I may be misunderstanding his approach given its a short, edited interview.
Where is the value of RELATIONSHIP and human connection in this?
It reads like his vision of the future is a workforce of therapists on
shifts, and their work day varies in real time with different clients
being plugged constantly in and out of their schedules in real time.
(Again, my nightmare of therapy being treated like a call center.)
/"AI can help predict gaps in outpatient access and the
supply-and-demand imbalance within a health system or clinic population
by provider type, time of day and acuity level. This predictive ability
can help health systems optimize staffing and scheduling to increase
productivity and patient satisfaction."
/
So... on Mondays I work 9am-5pm, but on Wednesdays I work the 12pm-8pm
shift. Every other weekend I'm needed Saturday nights 8pm-2am because
of a client demand surge? Perhaps I get called-in when demand surges
unexpectedly?
Yes -- AI could (and should?) be used to automate routine tasks and
assist in diagnostic assessments and treatment recommendations. Can you
imagine all the chart data required to be in the database on each
client? Can you imagine what goes wrong if the algorithms are tuned wrong?
/"We should focus on machine learning applications that use discrete,
anonymized data to improve care delivery without putting patient
information at risk."
/
Promising...
/
"AI-powered tools can streamline these processes, potentially using
natural language processing to generate clinical notes from recorded
sessions or automating insurance coding. This allows clinicians to focus
more of their energy on direct patient care, potentially increasing the
number of patients they can see without compromising quality."
/
I'm all for it. In other short essays I have already stated my opinions
that these AIs should be local, open source, and NOT connected to the
Internet or Cloud. It's becoming clear that I will lose this battle as
cloud services build market share and large hospitals incorporate AI
notes tools into EPIC and the like.
/"AI also can serve as a powerful decision support tool for
clinicians... But AI systems shouldn't replace clinical judgment...
For example, an AI system might flag potential drug interactions or
suggest alternative treatment approaches... However, it's always up to
the clinician to determine the appropriate level of care."
/
Yeah... and what happens to the employee therapist in a large health
system that goes against these recommendations? What happens in the
lawsuit in which the therapist did not follow the canned formulas
suggested by the AI? What diversity of approaches is lost in
standardization?
/"AI improves operational efficiency, optimizes resource allocation and
expands access to care – all of which affect a health system's bottom
line. AI algorithms can analyze patient data, historical patterns and
real-time factors to optimize appointment scheduling and clinician
workloads. This optimization can reduce no-show rates and improve
clinician efficiency."
/
I would love to be more efficient. I think this comes down to trust. I
do not trust that organizations with the money to invest in these tools
will make my work life better. Efficiency in what sense?
/"Under the proposal from CMS, covered products must haveFDA
clearance... Additionally, DMHT devices must be furnished "incident
to" a qualified practitioner's professional services via a prescription
or order in association with ongoing treatment under a plan of care –
and patients can use DMHT devices at home, in an office or in other
outpatient settings (if that is how the device has been cleared by the
FDA).... The codes encompass several key components: supply of the DMHT
device, the initial education and onboarding of the patient, the first
20 minutes of monthly treatment management services related to the
patient's therapeutic use of the device, and each subsequent 20 minutes
of monthly treatment management services."
/
_I see some serious upsides for us and clients:
_
Ability to do all of this, and get paid. I used to rent/sell FDA
approved devices for anxiety and sleep (CES Ultra), but clients had
to be able to afford them out-of-pocket.
It potentially lets us manage more clients by outsourcing some
treatment to devices.
It could let us turn shallow stuff over to devices (breathing
exercises) so we can concentrate on depth therapies in-session.
I see some serious downsides for us and clients:
It potentially lets us manage more clients by outsourcing some
treatment to devices. If large clinics and insurers run with this,
it will increase the caseloads of employee therapists and lower our
time per client.
It lets deep-pocketed device TechBro start-ups further push into the
mental health space.
It may encourage insurance companies to push devices before people.
Fewer authorized sessions?
This feels very similar to my personal unsubstantiated opinion that
therapists will shortly become the equivalent of "Tier 3 Tech
Support" -- I said there would be fewer of us, managing chatbots
under our licenses. But -- same idea -- there could be fewer of us,
managing "Tier 1" medical therapy devices.
It really depends upon how this is implemented and paid for. Done right
-- it gives us many more tools and pays for them. Done right, it lets
us do the deeper work in session. Done wrong, it devalues and removes
therapists from the equation. Why have a therapist work with anxiety
when the PCP can assign a nurse to watch over the medical devices and
capture the business for themselves?