There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

sunzu2 ,

NYT the original genocide deniers.

mintyogi ,

It’s an opinion piece.

carl_marks_1312 ,
@carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml avatar

Which had to pass the nyt editorial board.

anarchoilluminati ,
@anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net avatar

Those opinion rags need approval?

carl_marks_1312 ,
@carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml avatar

What I’m saying is that while this is an opinion piece, it had to pass an editorial board. Since this piece obv got publish, it means that it reflects the views of the board in some regard

anarchoilluminati ,
@anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net avatar

No, I understood that.

I’m just saying that I didn’t even realize that those absolutely trash opinion articles are getting approved despite how fucking garbage they are. I never really thought about it before. I just thought people just kinda wrote whatever within some guidelines.

carl_marks_1312 ,
@carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml avatar

You may as well be right. Thinking about how it’s a privately run business, It’s definitely within the realm of possibility and how it’s done in practice. It requires less time/ressources to have your journalists follow guidelines and punish them if they are not within guidlines. Reading the damn thing and haveing a lengthy approval process costs money after all…

PanArab ,
@PanArab@lemmy.ml avatar

Not expected from the mouthpiece of US imperialism.

queermunist ,
@queermunist@lemmy.ml avatar

I can’t help but read this as an attempt to whip up support for more direct intervention in Ukraine. They claim Russia is on the cusp of victory because the West lacks “the will” to defeat its rival. That sounds like they want their readers in the West to start pressuring governments to send more support, maybe even direct intervention, as an expression of that “will to win.”

snek_boi ,

I do see how the narrative in the headline could be a call to action, but the article doesn’t propose a solution behind which the audience can rally. At most, the article describes how Americans can interpret the inevitable defeat. Of course, this text doesn’t exist in isolation; other texts would have to do the heavy lifting so that Americans rally behind a war effort.

yogthos OP ,
@yogthos@lemmy.ml avatar

That was my read as well, and the conclusion is basically an admissions of defeat

Time will tell just how severe the security and economic consequences will be, but one thing is already clear. A small war far away from America’s borders has reshaped our world — and made America’s place in it smaller.

yogthos OP ,
@yogthos@lemmy.ml avatar

incredible admission here

Mr. Putin is already planning for victory. His latest so-called peace proposal — in which Russia keeps occupied territory and Ukraine is banned from joining NATO — was dismissed as propaganda by many Western leaders. But it is, in fact, the most realistic scenario for how this war will pan out.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •