There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

tal ,
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

As we’ve previously explored in depth, SB-1047 asks AI model creators to implement a “kill switch” that can be activated if that model starts introducing “novel threats to public safety and security,”

A model may only be one component of a larger system. Like, there may literally be no way to get unprocessed input through to the model. How can the model creator even do anything about that?

echodot ,

You would have assumed that legislators in California of all places would have access to experts that could explain to them why this won’t work.

Zarxrax ,

Wtf does a kill switch even mean? PCs have kill switches on them already, in the form of a power switch.

echodot ,

I’m afraid the AI has become self-aware and put a piece of tape over the power switch it is now unstoppable.

Rentlar ,

The legislator tried pressing the button on the monitor but the computer kept whirring!!! It’s alive and has a mind of its own!!!

Nima ,
@Nima@leminal.space avatar

listen, it’s California. these are the same weirdos that put cancer warning labels on everything that exists. they’re not the brightest legislators.

just kinda pat them on the head and say “good job, buddy!” and let them wag their tails blissfully.

conciselyverbose ,

But in a separate Fortune editorial from earlier this month, Stanford computer science professor and AI expert Fei-Fei Liargued that the “well-meaning” legislation will “have significant unintended consequences, not just for California but for the entire country.”

The bill’s imposition of liability for the original developer of any modified model will “force developers to pull back and act defensively,” Li argued. This will limit the open-source sharing of AI weights and models, which will have a significant impact on academic research, she wrote.

Holy shit this is a fucking terrible idea.

Zorsith ,
@Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I read that as “incentivizing keeping AI in labs and out of the hands of people who shouldn’t be using it”.

That said, you’d think they would learn by now from Piracy: once it’s out there, it’s out there. Can’t put it back in the jar.

conciselyverbose ,

They should be doing the exact opposite and making it incredibly difficult not to open source it. Major platforms open sourcing much of their systems is basically the only good part of the AI space.

LainTrain ,

Not open-sourcing it is a terrible idea, it just creates more black boxes and gives corporations a further upper hand.

JustAnotherKay ,

Yeah what do I care if Jimmy down the street enjoys using his Ollama chatbot? I’m too busy worrying about Terminator panning out

AbouBenAdhem ,

I haven’t yet read Li’s editorial, but I’m generally more inclined to trust her take on these issues than Hinton and Bengio’s.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •