Nigeria’s economic crisis is fueling a stunt philanthropy boom.

Churbleyimyam , 5 minutes ago

I’m against it because it is making money at the expense of others dignity. Also it is an appropriation and conflation of kindness and generosity with wealth, which undermines people’s self-esteem and celebrates consumerism as a solution to the problem of poverty, which has deeper systemic roots.

sunzu , 28 minutes ago

"philanthropy" is almost always done for scumming purposes...

do you think your daddy owners without do it without tax exemption and sheltering purposes?

fucking parasites...

these parasites just making it easily understandable to the masses that these people are milking the system. except the masses clearly not getting the lesson lol

we got what we deserve

dalakkin , 3 hours ago

Even though it’s often just for content and publicity, I’d much rather have that type of content than for example rage bait

ModerateImprovement OP , 3 hours ago

They both are bad and would not get much views if exposed for their real nature, just to quote from the article:

“What creators like Omotayo are doing looks good on the surface, [but] it is ethically wrong because the aim of such content is to generate more engagement and followers, which in turn result in wider fame and sponsorship deals for the creator,” Suraj Olunifesi, an associate professor and social media researcher at the University of Lagos, told Rest of World. “These creators should rather be called business people and not philanthropists.”

Olunifesi compared stunt philanthropy creators to Big Tech companies: They “may allow their platforms to be used for free, but they, in turn, exploit users’ data for profit.”