There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Switzerland mandates government agencies use open-source software and disclose the source code of software developed by or for the public sector unless third-party rights or security concerns apply

Switzerland has recently enacted a law requiring its government to use open-source software (OSS) and disclose the source code of any software developed by or for the public sector. According to ZDNet, this “public body, public code” approach makes government operations more transparent while increasing security and efficiency. Such a move would likely fail in the U.S. but is becoming increasingly common throughout Europe.

According to Switzerland’s new “Federal Law on the Use of Electronic Means for the Fulfillment of Government Tasks” (EMBAG), government agencies must use open-source software throughout the public sector.

The new law allows the codifies allowing Switzerland to release its software under OSS licenses. Not just that; it requires the source code be released that way “unless the rights of third parties or security-related reasons would exclude or restrict this.”

In addition to mandating the OSS code, EMBAG also requires Swiss government agencies to release non-personal and non-security-sensitive government data to the public. Calling this Open Government Data, this aspect of the new law contributes to a dual “open by default” approach that should allow for easier reuse of software and data while also making governance more transparent.

model_tar_gz ,

Fuck does this mean LibreOffice might get actual sponsorship, funding, organizational support? And not be a buggy steaming pile of shit that crashes my computer every ten minutes???

An engineer can dream, right?

I hate spreadsheet and slide deck days. Please oh universe help me get back to my happy place: codeland.

mox ,

“unless the rights of third parties or security-related reasons would exclude or restrict this.”

Without a narrow and specific definition of what qualifies, this clause looks to me like a free pass to ignore the law. I hope its inevitable abuse will lead to a quick shoring up of the language.

SorteKanin ,
@SorteKanin@feddit.dk avatar

Security concerns? Closed-source software is a security concern in itself!

yeather ,

Probably meant for military applications or classified materials.

Pistcow ,

I mean wouldn’t everything be a security concern in relation to government agencies?

odium ,

I feel like a lot of the front ends can be open sourced.

adam ,

I work for the UK government. Everything my organisation does is licensed in either MIT or OGL (www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/…/3/)

Developing code in the open really helps ensure you nail down your secure coding practices.

Petter1 ,

In my opinion especially security code needs to be open source…

jabathekek ,
@jabathekek@sopuli.xyz avatar

Nothing like bored programmers on the internet to nitpick the governments code.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines