There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

webghost0101 ,

This article will be aged junk in 3,2 …

I get that the article is about user count but that really is about perceived usefulnesses and also more decent ai competitors to chatgpt pro.

They literally only just released text to video which they say will be used as a foundation for agi reasoning.

They have also hinted that training on gpt5 has begun and that it will be faster to train then gpt4

Just before that google came out with a new model that can keep track off 10 mil tokens, beats gemini pro and is also much faster to train. Gemini pro is barely a month old

This will not be a quite year for ai, if theres any flatline its going go be vertical, googles progress nearly is. Most ai progress benefits the entire industry over time.

Cryan24 , (edited )

Given they quietly walked back their stance on military projects during the altman drama my guess would be MI related contracts.

SanndyTheManndy ,

What does your mother-in-law have to do with AI?

Mastengwe ,

Collapse inward on itself like a dying star is the hope.

Luisp ,

I think they mean we should put it out its misery?

feedum_sneedson ,

Jesus Christ it’s not all about growth.

Kbobabob ,

Line must go up

kromem ,

The free version sucks and the paid version increasingly refuses to do things for ‘safety’ and they have competitors finally catching up.

So where it goes is GPT-5 this year.

phoneymouse ,

It pisses me off when I ask it to do something specific and it comes back with some verbose response about all the things I should think about or look into if I were to want to do that thing. Like, bitch, I’m not asking for advice, do it.

kromem ,

The patronizing aspect is really ridiculous.

Especially when it gets the situation wrong as often as it does.

OpenAI have the best tech, but are making some really bad choices when it comes to productizing that tech.

Either the tech outpaces their bad decision making, or they are going to get eclipsed by companies catching up to their tech but with better product vision.

As amazing as I find their technology, I wouldn’t personally invest in the company.

phoneymouse , (edited )

I somehow think its usefulness isn’t tied to consumers logging in and just using it. Eventually, this thing will be bundled into a personal assistant like Siri or Alexa and that will be how most people use it.

Additionally, businesses are going to try to use it in a lot of different ways… replacing phone and chat support, writing ad copy, articles, code, legal documents, etc, etc, etc. It still feels a bit early for companies to have adopted it. I imagine it will just take a lot of work integrating it. ChatGPT also needs to be able to DO things, and wiring that all up is some work. For example, if I call a company for support with a product and ask for a refund, the AI needs to have access to the company’s systems to be able to do that task. It also has to do it reliably and correctly all the time.

It’s still really early days.

slimarev92 ,

Microsoft has a library that does exactly what you describe - Semantic Kernel. You can register plugins that do all sorts of things in the real world, and the AI API responds with instructions on how to use these plugins.

I’m very sceptical of LLMs, but this is the closest this technology came to actually being useful.

N00dle ,
@N00dle@lemmy.world avatar

That’s what the 7 TRILLION dollars they are seeking are for.

stoly ,

This was always going to be limited. Eventually, it doesn’t matter how much data you dump in, it won’t be unique enough to train anything new out of the model.

FeelThePower ,
@FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

hopefully it shrinks :)

homesweethomeMrL ,

Obviously you’re not evolved enough to realize th AI is THE FUTURE of all things and everything is better with AI! A child in a poor environment was saved by AI! A king who was mean was dethroned with AI! Everyone was made happy by AI! Say it! SAY IT!!!

nul ,

Who’s Al??

atrielienz ,

Allen Iverson.

phi1997 ,

I hope it goes away

werefreeatlast ,

Controlling drones to go get putin dead or…hey! Is that Buick? Anyway yes, putin please 🙏.

Modva ,

Jesus Christ, can we leave things alone that aren’t infinitely growing

micka190 ,

“Gentlemen, it’s come to our attention that every one who could pay to use our product is paying to use our product. Unfortunately, it also means we’re no longer growing infinitely like we promised the shareholders we would. How do we fix this?”

The infinite growth mindset is so fucking stupid. Like, you’re still making an insane amount of money, what’s the fucking problem?

Modva ,

Yup. Shareholders are the problem, who bought shares at price X and want to sell those shares at X+Y.

And they will do anything to get it.

slacktoid ,
@slacktoid@lemmy.ml avatar

Yes but what they stupidly never realize is Y is a signed integer not unsigned

z3rOR0ne , (edited )

Because stock bros be lazy AF. They can’t even be bothered to buy and sell stock based off of who is and isn’t doing well, so they utilize investment firms who offer safe and risky bets like ETFs and Futures respectively. Ultimately, everyone really just wants to buy one stock, have it make them money that exponentially makes even more money quarter after quarter forever, and then do whatever they’d actually do if money were no object (i.e. actually live life).

We don’t live in a world where desire/need scales evenly with this desire for exponential, eternal growth. Therefore capitalists, who promise this impossible prospect to Wall Street, exploit human fears, desires, and needs however they can (union busting, lobbying, etc.) to keep growth up for as long as they can.

George Carlin probably put this concept best in what has to be one of the greatest bits of all time, on The Big Club. Although not directly related to this topic per se, it points to the truth of how this game between government politicians and capitalist corporate overlords is played. All the while, the majority of people, who are not in “The Big Club”, are basically fucked.

rottingleaf ,

Still I’m feeling tickles of admiration with nature seeing how these two seemingly unconnected things work together (human dream of making something from nothing without work, politicians being corrupt without realizing it).

stoly ,

Business people really are just monkeys chasing shiny things. They tend to be less developed emotionally and are often very insecure on top of the entitlement. All they have is the chase, nothing else.

The most useless degree a university can grant is one in business administration.

SlopppyEngineer ,

No. Money has to make money with those sweet sweet interested payments. It’s baked in the system. How else are you going to maintain a small elite of filthy rich people?

Aceticon ,

Ever more wealth must be constantly created in the World purelly to service the interest on all that debt out there otherwise you would get defaults and banks failing.

It’s not by chance that everywhere the “solution” for the 2008 Crash (that happenned due to over-indebtness mainly in the mortgage segment) was to lower interest rates to pretty much zero - it weakens the pressure on the entire system to constantly grow merelly to generate the additional wealth needed to pay the interest on the debt.

You’ll also notice that as soon as interest rates went up just a bit bank profits mssivelly grew.

rottingleaf ,

Well, there are demands unsatisfied as long as humanity exists, so there is always space for good growth.

Only that is about infrastructure, or housing, or food production. Not chat bots.

Keineanung ,

This!

Toes ,

GPT tried to convince me that there was more time in 366 days than 1.78 years.

FaceDeer ,
@FaceDeer@kbin.social avatar

Large language models are notoriously poor at math, you should probably use a different tool for that sort of thing.

strawberry ,

glorified autocorrect bad at math. who could have guessed

Windex007 ,

How do reconcile that with all of the people claiming they use it to write code?

FaceDeer ,
@FaceDeer@kbin.social avatar

Writing code to do math is different from actually doing the math. I can easily write "x = 8982.2 / 98984", but ask me what value x actually has and I'll need to do a lot more work and quite probably get it wrong.

This is why one of the common improvements for LLM execution frameworks these days is to give them access to external tools. Essentially, give it access to a calculator.

whoelectroplateuntil ,

If you’re like most developers, cognitive dissonance? gitclear.com/coding_on_copilot_data_shows_ais_dow…>

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines