There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Emperor ,
@Emperor@feddit.uk avatar

I rather enjoyed it while it lasted but I was rather just posting interesting bits I was posting here, so perhaps here is the best alternative. šŸ¤·

I may have also been using it as a kind of replacement for del.icio.us, which is much missed. I gave Postmarked a go but it isnā€™t doing it for me.

leaskovski ,
@leaskovski@kbin.social avatar

What are the best news aggregators that people use these days? I have fallen back to using news.google.com, which Im not that too happy about, but it does seem to work ok for me.

QuadratureSurfer ,
@QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world avatar

Iā€™ve been using Ground News. Itā€™s interesting to get breakdowns on which way stories are being spun by each side.

dantheclamman OP ,

Newsasfacts.com

Techmeme.com

Memeorandum.com

Metafilter.com

But mostly Iā€™ve started just monitoring dozens of RSS feeds with the Feeder RSS app (android)

reddig33 ,

Itā€™s a shame. It was a good news aggregator. Much better than the news app included with iOS. Youā€™d think if they lost the comments section/moderation and added some ads and a premium ad-free tier, it couldā€™ve stayed in business. Also surprised they didnā€™t find a buyer whoā€™d want to slap their name on existing tech.

capital ,

I tried it as a replacement to Apple News and found it to be much worse.

As the other comment said, the ā€œAIā€ integration was poorly implemented and didnā€™t allow enough tailoring to make it worth it.

The comments and social features shouldnā€™t have been implemented.

On top of that, it didnā€™t have big news publishers like the Atlantic. Had plenty of listicle BS from sites Iā€™d never heard of before. As I scrolled through I found myself thinking ā€œwho TF is this?ā€.

huginn ,

Not terribly surprised. When I tried the app out I didnā€™t really get the appeal. It was like adding a comments section to existing news feeds and didnā€™t provide enough tailoring or algorithmic understanding of reading habits to be a compelling offering.

Besides the fact that they were using a chrome embedded browser, meaning I couldnā€™t even ad block on the sites I visited: which made the reading experience nearly impossible.

reddig33 ,

It had a built in reader mode to bypass the shitty ad-ridden websites. My favorite feature was the block words list. No more stories with the word ā€œkardashianā€ for example.

huginn ,

Mustā€™ve come after I gave it a shot: I picked it up pretty soon after release.

TwinTusks ,
@TwinTusks@bitforged.space avatar

The main attraction for me was the reader mode which blocks all ads, it also pushes similar articles from different new sites that I have never heard before (its a nice thing).

huginn ,

Firefox has reader mode and uBlock origin on mobile ;)

dantheclamman OP ,

I found it worked pretty well, seemed to understand my interests pretty well after a couple days, when I usually donā€™t feel that way, having tried many many similar apps. The chrome web view wasnā€™t ideal, but I use pihole which helped :)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • ā€¢
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines