gamma , 11 months ago

Thought I’d check on the Linux source tree tar. zstd -19 vs lzma -9:

<span style="color:#323232;">❯ ls -lh
</span><span style="color:#323232;">total 1,6G
</span><span style="color:#323232;">-rw-r--r-- 1 pmo pmo 1,4G Sep 13 22:16 linux-6.6-rc1.tar
</span><span style="color:#323232;">-rw-r--r-- 1 pmo pmo 128M Sep 13 22:16 linux-6.6-rc1.tar.lzma
</span><span style="color:#323232;">-rw-r--r-- 1 pmo pmo 138M Sep 13 22:16 linux-6.6-rc1.tar.zst
</span>

About +8% compared to lzma. Decompression time though:

<span style="color:#323232;">zstd -d -k -T0 *.zst  0,68s user 0,46s system 162% cpu 0,700 total
</span><span style="color:#323232;">lzma -d -k -T0 *.lzma  4,75s user 0,51s system 99% cpu 5,274 total
</span>

Yeah, I’m going with zstd all the way.