There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

JustZ ,
@JustZ@lemmy.world avatar

Click bait nonsense. I bet Harvard Law Review rejects 20 papers a day.

HubertManne ,

I actually do not get this type of headline. Outlets are not required to publish what is put in front of them. The title should just be the second half basically.

be_excellent_to_each_other ,
@be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social avatar

On Saturday, following several days of debate and a nearly six-hour meeting, the Harvard Law Review’s full editorial body came together to vote on whether to publish the article. Sixty-three percent voted against publication. In an e-mail to Egbariah, HLR President Apsara Iyer wrote, “While this decision may reflect several factors specific to individual editors, it was not based on your identity or viewpoint.”

What a crock of horseshit.

Doorbook ,

If this is now, imagine censorship before the internet…

Yamainwitch ,

This is such a powerful article, thank you for sharing. Should come as no surprise that Harvard Law Review refused to publish, I’m sure their endowments are heavily vested in the military industrial complex.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •