There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Supreme Court to consider whether ‘Trump Too Small’ can be trademarked without ex-president’s permission

A political activist’s desire to register a suggestive phrase targeting Donald Trump’s anatomy and policies is at the center of a Supreme Court case being heard Wednesday that will test the limits of the First Amendment.

Trump is not a party to the case, but his name will likely be tossed around constantly during oral arguments as the justices weigh whether a federal trademark statute that prevented the activist from registering “Trump Too Small” as a slogan for t-shirts without the former president’s explicit permission runs afoul of the First Amendment.

“The mark criticizes Trump by using a double entendre, invoking a widely publicized exchange from a 2016 Republican primary debate in which Trump commented about his anatomy, while also expressing Elster’s view about ‘the smallness of Donald Trump’s overall approach to governing as president of the United States,’” attorneys for the activist, Steve Elster, told the justices in court papers.

key ,

That shirt is irksome. Just make the last line “Small on health care” so it fits in one line and doesn’t ruin the pattern!

Alternatively civil rights should be lower so the right side forms a smooth line

MedicPigBabySaver ,

Ha, you’re correct. It’s garbage. SCOTUS should throw it out just on design alone.

Infynis ,
@Infynis@midwest.social avatar

The Supreme Court gets to pick and choose the cases they take. They usually take around a hundred each year. There are usually several thousand submitted to them. This is one that they took.

JonsJava ,
@JonsJava@lemmy.world avatar

Um… He’s not the only Trump, and it doesn’t say “Donald” on there. Couldn’t they just ask ANY Trump for permission? Pretty sure Mary Trump would gladly give permission.

HubertManne ,

You should not be able to trademark this. Its common knowledge and should be public domain.

agitatedpotato ,

“Court declares Trump got publicly owned”

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines