Bro try Google. It’s good to be skeptical but it’s not good to just unilaterally deny people’s assertions.
Bro what? How any more cluelessly condescending can you get? This is not a case of looking it up but of drawing conclusions out of nowhere. Do you just look up whatever phenomenon and apply it to every situation in your life? Is that who this works?
You’re also the one that suggested a parental link to begin with. Kindly fuck off.
I did no such thing, but please quote me.
You can look into this relationship yourself. It is well studied and well understood.
And it’s the parents’ fault? Are you sure about that? What if it was somebody else? What then? What if in this particular case that’s simply not the case? It’s certainly possible as well. The article doesn’t give you any details to go off on and yet we’re here drawing conclusions based on a generality. Why is that? Why don’t you go look up details about the case yourself and substantiate those claims? You know, following the burden of proof and all. I’m not gonna do your homework.
Or maybe you should look up burden of proof instead. Because it seems like you’re the one who needs to learn not to jump to conclusions out of thin air.
it’s not good to just unilaterally deny people’s assertions
And I’d argue that it’s more harmful to accuse people without reason, especially about sexual assault. You’re just turning people against others because you “guessed”.
And just for the record, and in the case that a parent was indeed molesting the kid in retrospect, it does not exonerate anybody drawing up random accusations.