jeremy_sylvis , 11 months ago

You are ridiculous. Try responding to any of the arguments I quoted and put in bold.

We’re still waiting for your responses to the arguments raised. You don’t get to ignore the arguments made and then complain waaah respond to the arguments - out of an abundance of good will, I’ve addressed your source itself and highlighted its myriad flaws.

It was you that threw up a linked and said “Duke says,” no context, no quotes, no arguments.

I see you haven’t bothered to glance it over. That, at least, confirms the suspicions regarding your failure to do so.

My article contains undisputed facts.

See the previous comment regarding what these actually say. You seem to have just skipped right over that - perhaps continuing your trend of either not reading or failing to comprehend what one has read.

Your source does not seem to support your position in any way.

You are trying to revise actual history as this and the weight of all law review articles on the subject demonstrate.

You find my one instance of the “phrase bear arms” prior to 1776 suggesting clearly an individual right, and you might have a leg to stand on. You cannot.

Both of which were quite clearly addressed by the previous comment - the one you seem to have not actually read.