jeremy_sylvis , 11 months ago

Also clear is that “bearing arms” was strictly a military connotation.

Was it? Duke’s analysis of the history seems to disagree with you and your baseless claim. Interestingly enough, this is in-line with the opinion in this exact recent ruling.

But hey since you’re ignoring history and rewriting to serve your ammo sexuality, might as well rewrite all of it.

You seem to be the one rewriting history, friend.

That said… lol. That you can’t discuss a thing you dislike without seeking to disparage others - e.g. ammo sexual - highlights the worth of your contributions. Why don’t you try an actual argument, next time?