There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Harris and Trump are getting ready for Tuesday’s debate in sharply different ways

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are veering sharply in how they gear up for Tuesday’s presidential debate, setting up a showdown that reflects not just two separate visions for the country but two politicians who approach big moments very differently.

The vice president is cloistered in a historic hotel in downtown Pittsburgh where she can focus on honing crisp two-minute answers, per the debate’s rules. She’s been working with aides since Thursday and chose a venue that allows the Democratic nominee the option of mingling with swing-state voters.

Trump, the Republican nominee, publicly dismisses the value of studying for the debate. The former president is choosing instead to fill his days with campaign-related events on the premise that he’ll know what he needs to do once he steps on the debate stage at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.

“You can go in with all the strategy you want but you have to sort of feel it out as the debate’s taking place,” he said during a town hall with Fox News host Sean Hannity.

Trump then quoted former boxing great Mike Tyson, who said, “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.”

girlfreddy OP ,
@girlfreddy@lemmy.ca avatar

“Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.”

Yes they do Donnie. I wonder if you’ll remember that when you’re laid out on the debate stage from the beatdown Kamala inflicts on your orange ass.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

He’s into being spanked on the ass. Ask Stormy Daniels.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Kamala Harris will be spending a great deal of time both studying policy and practicing with seasoned opponents and people with a deep understanding of Trump’s psychology.

Trump will argue with a cheeseburger.

KingGordon ,

Hamberder.

tate ,
@tate@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

cheeberder

girlfreddy OP ,
@girlfreddy@lemmy.ca avatar

Hahahaha!!!

Curious_Canid ,
@Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca avatar

That’s a far better summary than anything I’ve seen in the press. Good work!

Jesusaurus ,

Trump will argue with a cheeseburger

And will angrily eat it when it wins the argument

Myxomatosis ,

Kind of ironic that Donnie uses that particular Mike Tyson quote because he’s a whiny little bitch who is afraid of direct confrontation and has only ever punched women.

superkret ,

So Trump’s plan is to punch her in the face on live TV?
It’s a bold move…

Vikthor ,

If he does I would like the Secret Service let her punch him back just to see his orange surprised pikachu face.

Semi_Hemi_Demigod ,
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world avatar

let_them_fight.jpg

WoodScientist ,

You know. That’s actually an interesting hypothetical. How does the Secret Service react if two people with Secret Service protection try to fight each other? I imagine they would first protect whoever has the most seniority, as in the current serving president, then current vice president, etc. But what if say, two former presidents try to duke it out?

Or can the president waive Secret Service protection? Since the president has broad immunity for ‘official acts’, does this mean the president can now duel someone on the White House Lawn at dawn?

Nollij ,

They each have their own protection detail. Each will quickly move to protect the one they are responsible for, which will mean separating them (probably by a lot of distance).

Someone under SS protection can choose to waive it. There are some former presidents who deemed it unnecessary later in life.

No idea about the rest of your hypothetical

5opn0o30 ,

I’d assume that they’re different details and chains-of-command so each to their own.

damniticant ,

I imagine it would look something like NFL refs trying to breakup a fight.

Oxymoron , (edited )

Well yeah. Because Trump’s strategy will just be to talk about all the shit he already talks about, regardless of the question. If he does actually try to answer the question he will likely just waffle, call things fake news, call Kamala a communist, shit like that. Kamala will have a normal strategy of actually answering the questions like literally any other politician would in any other debate. Hopefully she can also shut down Trump with a few simple similar to “he’s weird” comments, because even though it’s a shame that they work, they do actually work for just dismissing his bullshit and are simple to understand for the simple minded.

As I say, it’s a shame so many people are apparently that simple, that stuff like “make America great again” and “fake news, that’s just fake news” actually work: but they do work for persuading certain simple minded people who the Democrats need votes from.

It’s kinda how the whole “when they go low we go high” thing doesn’t actually work as a complete strategy.

Yes she needs to be making coherent, actual points as well. But having the odd simple put down and knowing when something Trump has said is so insane, that it actually doesn’t deserve a proper answer, but simply a dismissal is important.

Otherwise you end up being on the defensive constantly and run out of time to actually make your own coherent points.

Tower ,

Will you shut up, man?

elgordino ,

I hope Harris doesn’t over prepare, she does need to maintain a certain level of off the cuff affability.

Over preparation was Biden’s fatal error, he was struggling so hard to hit his talking points he couldn’t keep things straight. Obviously things are vastly different with Harris, but she’d be best to not just be a talking point machine.

bradorsomething ,

Biden’s stutter leads him to greatly overprepare.

girlfreddy OP ,
@girlfreddy@lemmy.ca avatar

That’s the main reason I gave up on watching political debates years ago, because nothing ever gets directly answered. It’s all fillers and boasting about past hurrahs and talking points.

If they just answered the fucking questions I’d be happy.

andyburke ,
@andyburke@fedia.io avatar

Calling these things presidential "debates" is rich, indeed.

smokinliver ,

I totally see your point.

But with the switch from “when they go low,…” to “fuck it, we can hut below the belt even better”, I gotta admit I am quite interested to see how she will handle a formal debate: Hammer phrases like everyone before or hitting hard and agile.

Idk, somehow I feel we might see something refreshing this time.

girlfreddy OP ,
@girlfreddy@lemmy.ca avatar

Maybe I’ll watch the highlights or something 'cause I can’t stand Trump’s voice, his meandering and the bullshit he spews. His mere existence just pisses me off to no end.

smokinliver ,

Preach

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines