There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

The Internet Archive Loses Its Appeal of a Major Copyright Case

The Internet Archive has lost a major legal battle—in a decision that could have a significant impact on the future of internet history. Today, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled against the long-running digital archive, upholding an earlier ruling in Hachette v. Internet Archive that found that one of the Internet Archive’s book digitization projects violated copyright law.

Notably, the appeals court’s ruling rejects the Internet Archive’s argument that its lending practices were shielded by the fair use doctrine, which permits for copyright infringement in certain circumstances, calling it “unpersuasive.”

In March 2020, the Internet Archive, a San Francisco-based nonprofit, launched a program called the National Emergency Library, or NEL. Library closures caused by the pandemic had left students, researchers, and readers unable to access millions of books, and the Internet Archive has said it was responding to calls from regular people and other librarians to help those at home get access to the books they needed.

MBFC
Archive

FrickAndMortar ,
ArbitraryValue ,

This is the obviously correct decision, and no other decision was realistically possible. The only difference between what the Internet Archive was doing and what any other piracy webpage does is that the Internet Archive was claiming to do it for a good cause. What were they thinking?

andrew0 ,
@andrew0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

If I am not mistaken, the difference was that the Internet Archive was distributing books with a DRM that would make the PDF unusable after a certain time. You could relate it to how a physical library offers books for a limited time, for free. Now, of course, one could bypass the DRM or copy the contents differently, but so can another person photocopy a book they borrowed physically. Meanwhile, other physical libraries are allowed to distribute e-books, but I’m not sure if that’s made possible due to licensing fees.

I’m not saying that they approached this well, especially given the copyright laws in the US, but it was indeed a good thing for the normal person at the time. Too bad that the judicial system in the US is biased towards leeching companies. I really can’t wait to see the AI vs publishers fight, though. Let’s see who has deeper pockets and better plants in the courts :D

NocturnalMorning ,

Copyright law in the U.S. is stupid. Leave the U.S. and take your archive somewhere else.

N0x0n ,

Alot of bad things happening these months… Nintndo, youtube, streaming sites, zlib, manifestV3, EU laws on cryptography to protect " the children"…

Dark days ahead? :/

ElectricTrombone ,
@ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world avatar

What’s happening to zlib?

grue ,

The Internet Archive needs to flee the US before the copyright cartel can destroy it completely and usher in an Internet dark age.

SzethFriendOfNimi ,
@SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world avatar

I love the internet archive but it’s been an uphill battle all along since it seems they really didn’t have a lot of legal protection.

Here’s a four year old video by Lawful Masses (a copyright lawyer) on the origination of the case and how the law applies.

youtu.be/NlznlF3AMio

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines