There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/27/us/klamath-dam-removal-salmon.html?unlocked_article_code=1.GE4.R5nr.QWMEUvH8n0we&smid=url-share

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

givesomefucks ,

It’s not just the loss of hydro power, it’s going to cut water availability upstream of the dams.

They need to at least introduce a bunch of beaver to get that back, but I’d have loved to see one of those adaptions to help salmon past the dams instead of this. We can’t count on everything returning naturally to how it was 100 years ago before the dams.

This sounds great, I just hope they thought it thru first.

silence7 OP ,

There were a couple decades of thinking it through first. We can’t get back exactly what we had — temperatures are higher now, and that affects evaporation and salmon, but this seems like the right decision in this location.

givesomefucks ,

Yeah. I’m just worried about the effects on surrounding vegetation and if increased dryness would make more fires, and allow them to spread further.

I don’t think this spot is really that far away from where we’ve deployed beavers for that. And salmon can jump a beaver dam.

Seems like the best option to mitigate downside of dam removal.

silence7 OP ,

We all know what that means.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines