I feel like this could go badly. Tying someone to a permanent location who may be on the radar could be used against them. Also, if they then get deported, which seems more likely if they own to me, whose on the hook? I’m not sure from the article. Does a bank get the house and the money? I can’t tell if this is all state, or state supported through a bank. I could see this abused badly. If the house goes to a bank, wouldn’t the bank have a perverse incentive to report them and get them deported?