There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

parpol ,

I said it in other threads already, but none of the evidence presented about sexism and Game Science were legitimate.

The sexist remarks quoted and shown in articles such as the one by IGN, were proven to be mistranslated and not sexist at all.

And of all anonymous claims of sexism within the company not a single person came forward so none can be proven or hold any ground whatsoever.

The “feminist propaganda” likely refers to the smear campaign IGN and other game journalists did on Game Science mysteriously right after they had refused a $7m extortion from Sweet Baby Inc.

It should be noted here that IGN knows and has commented on the fact that the sexist remarks were mistranslations but they still didn’t edit or retract the article. Instead they gave a non-apology saying it was Game Science’s fault for not responding and denying the allegations, which is just completely unreasonable.

Also, I’ve never heard of any of those streamers mentioned in this article, and not a single one I saw talked about politics of feminist propaganda during the streams. Game journalists are coping about the fact that the game was incredibly successful despite their efforts.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines