There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

‘Monument to history’ battle between US and China over future of Mao’s secretary’s diary

Beijing is believed to be behind court bid to secure account of life inside Communist HQ

In the early hours of 4 June 1989, Li Rui, a veteran of the Chinese Communist party (CCP), was standing on the balcony of his apartment on Chang’an Boulevard in central Beijing. He could see tanks rolling towards Tiananmen Square.

For weeks, up to a million protesters had been gathering peacefully in Beijing’s plaza, demanding political reform. But they failed. Instead, as Li observed from his unique vantage point, troops opened fire, killing an estimated several thousands of civilians. It was the worst massacre in recent Chinese history. “Soldiers firing randomly with their machine guns, sometimes shooting the ground and sometimes shooting toward the sky,” Li wrote in his diary. A “black weekend”.

The first-hand account of an event that the Chinese government has systematically tried to distort and erase from the historical record is one of thousands of observations noted in Li’s diaries, which he kept meticulously between 1938 and 2018. Few people, especially not of Li’s stature, have kept such detailed records of this tumultuous era in Chinese history. Now those diaries are the subject of a hotly disputed lawsuit, the trial of which begins on Monday.

NOT_RICK ,
@NOT_RICK@lemmy.world avatar

So Beijing wants to memory hole this guy’s journal. Gross

YaDownWitCPP ,

You got a problem, Rick?

Doom ,

It is crazy to me people still try to say this event didn’t happen

Chinese bots on Lemmy will hit you with this shit; redsails.org/another-view-of-tiananmen/

WanderingVentra ,

Thankfully I haven’t seen anyone on Lemmy deny it happened, more that it’s numbers of dead, some of its bigger myths (people run over by tanks for example), and importance in China are over exaggerated.

WanderingVentra ,

Once I read the article, it’s kind of a tough one. The wife wants the journal, but says they can still make copies for the Hoover Institute archives. But they want to keep the original source. But shouldn’t China have access to its own primary sources, the same way we say Egypt should have access to its own ancient artifacts? Idk, maybe everyone here disagrees with me, but I don’t think it’s as cut and dry as I originally thought from the beginning.

MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
> Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/18/monument-to-history-battle-between-us-and-china-over-future-of-maos-secretarys-diary

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines