There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Elon Musk draws fire for playing down impact of America’s atomic bombing of Japan: ‘Not as scary as people think’

Elon and Trump make the worst possible argument for nuclear power I have ever heard:

“Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed but now they are full cities again,” the multibillionaire owner of Tesla, SpaceX and X said.

“That’s great, that’s great,” Mr Trump responded.

“It is not as scary as people think, basically,” Mr Musk added.

They joked about nuclear power facing a “branding problem”.

“We will have to rebrand it,” the former president told Mr Musk. “We will name it after you or something.”

charade_you_are ,

It would be really fun to punch him in the face for like 30 minutes.

cman6 ,

The internet has come full circle!

There used to be a game in the 90’s where you punch Bill Gates in the face.

Like this:
github.com/Martysh12/punch-bill-gates

MTK ,

Nuclear power needs rebranding

Elon: “TrumpX”

Xaphanos ,

I only recently learned of this:

youtu.be/olFmklCCccE?feature=shared

RagnarokOnline ,

This and Grave of the Fireflies are the two depictions of Japanese tragedy during WWII that I always think of

MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Independent:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
> Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/elon-musk-japan-nuclear-attacks-b2595497.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

lemmeout ,

It clear most here didn’t listen to the steam. There is a lot of bullshit in that stream. But this barely meets the bar.

Trump was on the coal and oil train and Elon was basically trying to convince Trump that nuclear power is not as risky as people make it out to be. He even refuted Trump’s claim that the land in Fukushima and other nuclear disasters will be inhabitable for 1000+ years. His example may have been in poor taste, but not like the headlines make it out to be.

P.S. In 2024, is there already not enough material from these two dipshits that the news sites still have to take things out of context for clicks?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •