tldr: he’s against their government-led human rights abuses and their invasion of the south China sea, while understanding the country well enough to recognize that the country is full of complex, cultured people that can be met on common ground rather than as faceless, alien enemies.
1st paragraph starts off with how he speaks Chinese and has traveled there often, 2nd mentions that some people don’t like that, and then quotes waltz saying that the US-China relationship doesn’t need to be adversarial.
nuance up top, no worries.
but my tldr is for anyone who doesn’t want to read anyway.
Your summary is fine, I just don’t like that the article paints him as pro China in the beginning. And only way down show the strong criticism he has towards China too.
Complete bullshit article parroting what the opposition say about Walz, because that way they can’t be accused of libel according to (moronic) laws. The truth is quite the opposite: www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgewpzyd91o
he chose 4 June - the day Beijing sent the troops in - as the date of their wedding five years later. She said that “he wanted to have a date he’ll always remember”.
Time Magazine - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Time Magazine:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source