There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Google violated antitrust laws to dominate online search, rules US judge

Google violated antitrust laws as it built an internet search empire, a federal judge ruled on Monday in a decision that could have major implications for the way people interact with the internet.

Judge Amit Mehta found that Google violated section 2 of the Sherman Act, a US antitrust law. His decision states that Google maintained a monopoly over search services and advertising.

“After having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence, the court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” the ruling states.

The ruling is one of the largest antitrust decisions in decades, capping off a case that pitted the justice department against one of the world’s most valuable companies. It was also part of a broader push in recent years from the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, as well as European regulators, to scrutinize big tech companies for allegedly monopolistic practices.There was no jury in the trial, which began in September of last year before taking a long hiatus for Mehta to consider a ruling. Closing arguments wrapped up in the first week of May, with Mehta concluding the trial by stating that he was aware of the gravity of the case for both Google and the public.

AShadyRaven ,

Thats crazy because in the timeline i came from, everyone knew Google was a monopoly 20 years ago!

Have you guys boycotted facebook for stealing your information yet? We started talking about that back in 2012.

And you all abandoned Youtube for being inconsistent with their copyright process and how they monetize creators, right? Right?

Reverendender ,

Is this…sarcasm?

AShadyRaven ,

im either joking, a liar or a time traveler

Occams Razor would suggest I’m probably not a time traveler

nobody158 ,

That’s what a time traveler would say

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah sure, John Titor.

militaryintelligence ,

I just switched to duckduckgo. Better results, not inundated with ads. Search for software on Google and the first 3-5 results, at least, are sponsored scam links.

AShadyRaven ,

i must be doing something wrong because to me, duckduckgo doesnt even work as well as AskJeeves did in 2001

tiredofsametab ,

Better results

That's not generally my experience. I still try DDG first, but probably 20-25% of the time, I have to switch back to Google. Oddly, not for the stuff in Japanese or related to Japan, but more tech and other such.

citrusface ,

Marginalia is where the good shit is.

Reverendender ,

Any bets on penalties?

Bonesince1997 ,

And they just made that exclusive deal with reddit

Buffalox ,

This is surprising IMO, the trend the past almost 3 decades (since the Clinton administration) has been to give the giants a free pass on almost everything. Bush ended the case against Microsoft, and since then there has been zero big case victories for competition and consumers that I can remember.

Maybe pressure from Europe helped, we’ve seen a lot of high profile rulings from EU, so maybe it’s “get your shit together, or we will do it for you” kind of situation?

Ab_intra ,
@Ab_intra@lemmy.world avatar
MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
> Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/aug/05/google-loses-antitrust-lawsuit

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines