There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Hegar ,
@Hegar@fedia.io avatar

Anyone know why Sanders voted no on this?

jeffw OP ,
@jeffw@lemmy.world avatar
Hegar ,
@Hegar@fedia.io avatar

Looks like it.

$2 billion retroactive tax break each to Lockheed Martin and Raytheon
...
bill would provide at least $3 in corporate tax breaks for every $1 in tax cuts for working families with children. That is not a good deal.

Ok, yeah, fuck giving $4b to some of the world's richest murderers and fuck disguising a pointless payout to the rich as helping the poor.

By ensuring the rich get more, this bill would have increased inequality.

taiyang ,

Aaaand this is why I read the comments. Thank you folks for clarifying.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

But of course, that’s not why Vance skipped the vote. He didn’t want to be seen voting no on a bill that appeared to help kids.

MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

Salon Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)> Name: salon.com> Bias: Left
> Factual Reporting: Mixed
> Country: United States of America
> Full Report: mediabiasfactcheck.com/salon/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

FooterBeep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

Cris_Color ,
@Cris_Color@lemmy.world avatar

Nifty bot! Always nice to have additional context :)

FenrirIII ,
@FenrirIII@lemmy.world avatar

Maybe he was having a new couch delivered

some_guy ,

Dickbag.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines