There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Strict rules about flying with dogs start Thursday, after months of confusion

What do the new rules say?

The CDC announced in May that beginning Aug. 1, dog owners must complete a new form and all dogs entering the U.S. must be over six months old, have a microchip and “appear healthy upon arrival.”

Additional restrictions and requirements apply depending on where the dog was vaccinated and if the dog has recently been in one of the more than 100 countries identified as high risk for rabies. A dog might have to pass a blood test or be forced to quarantine for 28 days in a CDC-registered facility, the costs of which fall back on owners, according to the CDC’s website. It can also be difficult to provide proof of a dog’s whereabouts, especially one that was a stray.

MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

USA Today Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)> Name: usatoday.com> Bias: Left-Center
> Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
> Country: United States of America
> Full Report: mediabiasfactcheck.com/usa-today-2/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

FooterBeep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

ripcord ,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Who isn’t Left-Center according to this site…??

rockSlayer ,

dog might have to pass a blood test or be forced to quarantine for 28 days in a CDC-registered facility, the costs of which fall back on owners

That’s pretty bullshit. If they force it and the person can’t afford it, are they just going to steal the dog? If they want this to be effective at actually reducing disease, it should be provided at no cost. Even if it were free, the possibility of having your pet forced into quarantine while traveling is already a deterrent to flying with pets. Forcing the cost benefits literally no one.

Reverendender ,

Seriously, this is America. At least give them a Panera gift card

qantravon ,

You think the CDC can afford to eat that cost? Who do you think they are, part of the military? They don’t have the budget for that.

calcopiritus ,

They’d just give the dog to the police so they can practice their dog shooting skills.

rand_alpha19 ,

I hate to break it to you, but a lot of other countries already have policies like this for public health and environmental reasons, and the cost and quarantine arrangements always fall on the owner.

They probably either keep it in quarantine and then send it to the pound or put the dog down, unfortunately, if the owner isn't able to prove that the dog is healthy enough to enter the country. Unless they decide to cancel the trip and go back where they came from.

rockSlayer ,

Just because something is common, doesn’t mean it’s right. Of all the countries in the world, the richest one can certainly afford to provide it without cost.

Frozengyro ,

We don’t have unlimited resources, and that’s frankly not a good use of them. I’m not saying there aren’t other worse things we spend money on, but I don’t think this would be a good use of our resources.

rand_alpha19 ,

Why do you feel entitled to not have to pay for your dog's quarantine? You own the dog and are responsible for its care and health, and if you're traveling or immigrating you should have money to spare simply because those actions require considerable savings.

Do you also feel like your passport and birth certificate should be free?

rockSlayer ,

Yes, and yes. What the hell is the point of government if it doesn’t provide social benefits?

Deceptichum ,
@Deceptichum@quokk.au avatar

To redistribute your tax money into the hands of a few wealthy peoples.

EtherWhack ,
@EtherWhack@lemmy.world avatar

Even if it were free, the possibility of having your pet forced into quarantine while traveling is already a deterrent to flying with pets.

Yes. Let’s just ignore that pets can have or carry different diseases, even zoonotic ones.

rockSlayer ,

I think you misunderstood me. I’m saying that people will try to justify the cost as a deterrent, and I already see the deterrent in the disease prevention process so the cost serves no purpose.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

You really shouldn’t try to fly with dogs anyway. They’re more walking-type animals. They can jump, but you’re not going to get from New York to Paris that way.

Shadow ,
@Shadow@lemmy.ca avatar
FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

That’s not flying, it’s falling in style!

qisope ,
@qisope@lemmy.world avatar

not in a single jump, no. several will be required.

Magister ,
@Magister@lemmy.world avatar

The problem is for people entering USA by cars, millions of canadians per year! A lot with their dogs, going camping and all. I go in the state maybe once or twice per month, I will need to fill a CDC report every time? It does not make sense.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines