There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Fedizen ,

oh he’s trying to buy a pardon, lmao

Mediocre_Bard ,

Shouldn’t have fucked those kids.

DessertStorms ,
@DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Shouldn’t have fucked raped those kids.

FTFY

whostosay ,

So we have 22 per hour upvoting OP and and 8 per hour upvoting logic, WHAT THE FUCK

Iheartcheese ,
@Iheartcheese@lemmy.world avatar

What

whostosay ,

I was measuring at the time how many people up voted fucked, vs upvoted the proper term rape per hour. And I think my math stands.

Iheartcheese ,
@Iheartcheese@lemmy.world avatar

What a strange thing to scream what the fuck over

whostosay ,

I’ve reached that conclusion. I had a good ol spin out earlier.

halcyoncmdr ,
@halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world avatar

I’m always on the fence with these subpoena resistance cases.

On the one hand, it’s Twitter, Elon, and Epstein related. Fuck all of them.

On the other hand, I don’t think that businesses should just blindly turn over information because the DOJ managed to find a judge that would rubber stamp a subpoena. Obviously that’s not every subpoena, or even likely a large number of them in the grand scheme, but it happening even once is too much to take it at face value being justified.

RestrictedAccount ,

His Fifth Amendment rights are still protected.

protist , (edited )

This subpoena has nothing to do with the DOJ. This subpoena was issued as part of discovery in the civil defamation case between the two women in the article

Most likely what I think is happening here is X literally does not have the records that are being subpoenaed, because why keep records when you’re trying to destroy a business?

mean_bean279 ,

100% agree. I do love the irony (hypocrisy?) of it all though.

whostosay ,

Tell me you also fucked kids without telling me you also fucked kids.

brbposting ,

I think they’re saying Elon sucks and be wary of trusting the government.

The fed’s anti-encryption stance comes to mind. “We need backdoors in your messaging apps but it’s just to protect the children!

whostosay ,

Both of these have been true for a looong time. Any step to concede this point is complicit.

brbposting ,

Any step to concede this point is complicit.

Hmm, I don’t take your point. What do you mean, please?

halcyoncmdr ,
@halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world avatar

You seem to have a problem with reading comprehension buddy. Nothing in this entire thread is even remotely close to defending Epstein or his accomplices.

The closest it gets is demanding that the Constitutional rights of US citizens actually be acknowledged and defended instead of just allowing the government to ignore them because of some bullshit “think of the kids” excuse which is never about the kids, it’s always been about giving the police more excuses to arrest anyone they want. Usually those in the way of the rich and powerful, or a group they can then point to and classify as a criminal to justify treating them as less worthy of respect or basic rights.

Snowflake ,

it’s always been about giving the police more excuses to arrest anyone they want. Usually those in the way of the rich and powerful, or a group they can then point to and classify as a criminal

Can you point to any person or group of persons this has happened to?

njm1314 ,

For the life of me I don’t understand your argument here. You’re basically advocating for the destruction of the justice system? So if I try to sue a company for say bodily injury or something they should be able to hide all the evidence? Good lord don’t corporations have enough power as is? Why give them more?

LEDZeppelin ,

Explains $48 million a month down payment for favorable outcomes in imminent court cases

Myxomatosis ,

So that’s why the Musk Rat has latched onto Pedophile Donald. Pedos of a feather flock together.

BigMacHole ,

THAT explains why he all of a Sudden Endorsed Trump! Because Trump, who was BEST FRIENDS with Jeffrey Epstein until Epstein bought a Bigger Mansion, definitely would NOT Protect Elon Musk if it was found out Elon Musk was Raping Kids on Epstein Island!

subignition ,
@subignition@fedia.io avatar

ok donald time to take away your phone for the night

protist ,

[Ghislaine] Maxwell recruited Giuffre at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Florida in 2000

Let’s return the focus to this sentence

expatriado ,

those subpoenas feel nonconsensual Elon?

AbidanYre ,

What if the DOJ gives him horse?

PrincessLeiasCat ,

This obviously changes everything.

someguy3 ,

X (the website formerly known as Twitter) is reportedly stonewalling subpoena requests related to a legal case involving dead financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Why? Nobody knows, but it sure is weird.

According to Business Insider, the social media platform refuses to give up information about one of the accounts linked to an Epstein accuser, a woman named Rina Oh Amen. The legal case is otherwise unrelated to the platform itself, instead it involves a spat between Oh Amen and another Epstein accuser, the more well-known Virginia Giuffre.

In court filings and public statements, each has accused the other of acting as one of Epstein’s recruiters rather than a true victim.

Drusas ,

May he rot in prison.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines