Linkerbaan OP , 5 months ago (edited 5 months ago)

First of all the Sky news claim is still true you conveniently ignored it.

https://news.sky.com/story/israeli-intelligence-report-claims-four-unrwa-staff-in-gaza-involved-in-hamas-kidnappings-13059967

For Noga I am unsure of her personal past, the articlese indicate she was a former foreign government employee. That speech however was made in front of the Knessset along with several others that tried to convincec israel to attack UNRWA

The headline of the article you linked indicates that NYT was presented evidence from their headline.

Israeli officials have presented evidence they say ties workers at a Palestinian aid agency in Gaza to violence during the Hamas-led attack on Israel.

You are correct it’s mentioned further down in the paywalled article in a part that is not readable without subscription. So NYT is writing spectacular headlines about presented “evidence” which has not been presented. I thought that the leaked dossier was about the evidence? Maybe I’m not reading that correctly then

What NYT did is bad framing of a narrative with plausible deniability. You can score brownie points there if you want so you get 1/3.