There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

chellomere ,

I think if they just filled the alt= attribute with the emoji this would copy fine.

victorz ,

Absolutely ridiculous. For a company that touts web technologies down our throats all day, this is mind-boggling.

mp3 ,
@mp3@lemmy.ca avatar

They could have gone the webfont way instead…

Moonrise2473 ,

it’s because on web people would get different designs according to which operating system is used. Marketing prefers uniformity. They could load a webfont, but color font support is not really universal and because people use always the same 10 emojis it’s faster to load only those cached pngs compared to a full webfont with 3000 emojis that aren’t even used in that specific page

tmpod ,
@tmpod@lemmy.pt avatar

The web font would also be cached, and it wouldn’t be that big of a resource in the first place. I think being able to copy a comment’s content is more important, but whatever.

TrickDacy ,

But I’m INFURIATED tho!

Lysergid ,

But it’s FAANG company, they know how to do best /s

einlander ,

Odds are they did it so everyone would have uniform emojis. Would also enforce the gun to squirt toy change. Also it may be a remedy for the fact that android updates suck ass. A new phone may never be updated and be stuck with old emojis. Google should have learned by now to abstract away the hardware drivers, but that would make too much sense.

Azzu ,

What exactly does it matter to be stuck with old emojis? Why is it important for them to be perfectly uniform?

rimu ,
@rimu@piefed.social avatar

When they look different people interpret them differently.

https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/emoji-meanings-vary-hugely-between-platforms-meaning-characters-can-lead-to-vast-miscommunication-study-finds-a6980016.html

Azzu ,

I guess that makes more sense now that I see an example. I just can’t fathom how any Apple artist thought they made a “grinning face with smiling eyes” when they looked at that image. It’s “grimacing face with smiling eyes” very obviously. I thought all representations were like the others in this example - they all look like a “grinning face with smiling eyes”. They look different but it doesn’t matter.

I still think though that if there weren’t obvious mistakes like this, it doesn’t matter how the “grinning face with smiling eyes” exactly looks, or any other emoji for that matter.

dwindling7373 ,

It’s clearly another way to wall the apple garden further, to the point where you don’t get to communicate in an effective way unless you both have an iPhone.

bassomitron ,

That’s interesting. I wonder how true that still is today, given the study was done in 2016. The study also pointed out that even on the same platform, people on average interpreted the same emojis differently. I’d be interested in an updated study conducted among younger Gen Z to see if being completely raised in the digital age has created various emoji languages, especially across cultures (which they mention they wanted to do at the end of the article as well).

Kecessa ,

Wtf Microsoft?

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/5d93d6e5-b3db-410e-9cf7-3e6b297f4186.png

bionicjoey ,

The ones in MS Teams are so cursed. I use it for work and I swear everything about that app is peak catering to boomers.

victorz ,

Also made by boomers perhaps?

lvxferre ,
@lvxferre@mander.xyz avatar

When they look different people interpret them differently.

Ah, paralinguistic communication is always like this. Once you change the symbol ever so slightly, the meaning being conveyed also changes.

unreachable ,
@unreachable@lemmy.world avatar

hieroglif over kanji

sanguinepar ,
@sanguinepar@lemmy.world avatar

That’s really interesting, I didn’t realise the problem was that bad. I did the quiz at the bottom, tried to answer honestly and only got 5 out of 14 correct.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

I got 7 and even then that’s only because half way through I began to notice a theme on the really obscure ones with long names.

These are ridiculous, they often bear no resemblance at all to their supposed meaning wtf? Slanted closed eyes with steam coming out the nostrils isn’t anger it’s… “Triumph”!?

vinceman ,

Would love to see actual use vs intented use on that one lol.

sanguinepar ,
@sanguinepar@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, that was a particularly egregious one! Triumph? Triumph?!? Ok then…

joyjoy ,

You do realize you can load fonts with emojis, right? Does this work on mobile devices?

tal ,
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

That sucks.

I’d guess that what they were probably trying to do is make things work for random user who doesn’t have a font with said emojis installed and has no understanding of how to fix things.

Still seems like it’d be better to only fall back to rendering images if the user doesn’t have a suitable font installed; I’m pretty sure that that’s doable.

Might be possible to revert the change with GreaseMonkey or something like that.

Lojcs ,

if the user doesn’t have a suitable font installed

Then they can just download the font. No need for images.

I bet this is about making the emoji animated or something

einlander ,

Unless your on a mobile device and that’s not an option.

Lojcs ,

Why wouldn’t it be? I don’t mean install it, they could just download it on page load like other fonts

einlander ,

I guess webfonts would work.

tobogganablaze ,

That’s aweseome! Now you can set up uBlock to remove them. Love it.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •