There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Skedule ,

Almost as bad as a banana taped to the wall.

AI_toothbrush ,

Them fingers look like toes

onlooker ,
@onlooker@lemmy.ml avatar

omg, you’re right! The “hand” on the left looks like a foot.

paddirn ,

I think AI art is comparable to photography. Photographers do a lot of work behind the scenes to get everything set up, the equipment, lighting, angles, lenses, etc, But at the end of the day, the only action they’re taking to capture the art is they press a button, it’s not nearly the same amount of work that a painter or a musician puts into their art. So I think the idea of “capturing” art is still a valid thing. Sometimes a photographer can capture an award-winning masterpiece with a spur-of-the-moment photo on some shitty disposable camera. Maybe it took them 1000 bad photos to get that one photo, but they still just captured it from somewhere else, they didn’t create the work.

Similarly with AI, a person may have to work with the AI software to setup and craft the prompt that will eventually generate the art, then there may be dozens of iterations of that and fine-tuning to get the result they’re imagining, and even after that there may be some photoshopping involved to get it to where they want it. They’re capturing artwork from a source that may not be their own creation, just the same as photographers. I think AI art is just as legitimate as other forms of art, it’s just open to a wider range of people that can participate because many of the physical hurdles (equipment, space, time, lighting, etc) are not as much of an issue.

blaue_Fledermaus ,
@blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io avatar

While I think it's extremely overhyped, looking at some "AI" art communities it's clear that at least some put a lot of effort on it, going over many many iterations and tweaking the program and the results.

And anyway art is "made" by the observer, not the artist, even the results of natural processes can be art.

(AI in quotes because these tools don't deserve the name, at best High Coherence Media Transformers)

orca ,
@orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts avatar

AI “art” isn’t art. It’s just a trash bag of pieces pulled from real work that was sucked up into the model to learn from without any consent from the originators of said art. It’s fun to work with if you need inspiration to actually create art from, but it’s trash otherwise. I don’t mind people showing it off, but if you think you’re a genius because you typed a handful of prompts into a tool that far smarter people than you created, you’re on par with NFT and crypto folks. They seek the shortest route to success because they don’t want to put in the work. Art is organic and rooted in the emotion and experiences of living beings. It’s grounded in reality and understands that a human hand should have 5 digits on it and why.

It’s insanely complex and I don’t condemn the tech or the smart folks that create it, but what it generates is missing all of the organic factors that give art life. It’s being harnessed by capitalists to shut the human artists out, when it should instead be used by those artists as a tool to make their work easier.

Source: I’ve used multiple generators and have built software that uses ChatGPT and DALL-E. I’m also a digital artist.

Kalkaline ,
@Kalkaline@leminal.space avatar

You’re telling me this is lifeless and inorganic?

https://leminal.space/pictrs/image/197c288e-8e60-4c4a-9747-be8f0c2cb79f.jpeg

orca ,
@orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts avatar

It’s sterile as fuck. It looks like every single image I see AI blogs pump out for clickbait articles. It has no sense of lighting and the smiles are Uncanny Valley territory.

Edit: Guy on the right has the wrong number of fingers.

Zwiebel ,

OP when someone has fun playing around with AI generators, and wants to share the nicer looking results they got:

Lime66 ,

That’s fine, but ai “artists” act like their prompts(and even the images they didn’t do shit to make) are things they put their heart and soul into and get so mad that they have any people calling them out

Zwiebel , (edited )

Personally I haven’t seen any of that, just a lot of people butthurt (or scared for their livelyhood) that others can now make pictures with little effort.

Also some of these generated pics are the result of hundreds of trial-and-error attempts changing up the dozens of parameters and running multiple pieces of software in sequence to get the AI to spit out the wanted result.

The “Anti-AI” crowd tends to be completely ignorant on how this stuff actually works.

And some people have turned this AI stuff into their hobby, so they get defensive when you shit on them (“calling them out” as you word it)

Rozauhtuno ,
@Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Yeah, finding the right prompt is hard work that requires years of training 🤡

Zwiebel ,

Yeah, misconstruing my comment in one sentence and slapping on a clown emoji thinking that is a genious comeback is hard work that requires years of training

Rozauhtuno ,
@Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Thanks for noticing!

Dyskolos ,

Still more “art” to it than most of modern “art” 😁

velox_vulnus ,

“Modern art” also includes works like Black Swan 1 by WLOP and FUN by Mika Pikazo.

Lime66 ,

Technically, the impressionist and surrealist movements are modern art. But I bet you marvel at Monet’s pieces

Loulou , (edited )

I guess he’s confounding with “art contemporain” or post moderism.

Iapar ,

This statement is objectively wrong.

bjoern_tantau ,
@bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de avatar

Now I’m wondering if this was done by a bad AI pretending to be a good artist or a good artist pretending to be a bad AI.

Klear ,

Poe’s law is evolving!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •