kromem , 10 months ago

I love when people online try to correct other people about things that they have zero actual clue about.

Go ahead and cite any research supporting your view that it’s just a plagiarizing chatbot and nothing more.

To get the conversation started here’s a few counterpoint studies from Harvard/MIT and Princeton:

arxiv.org/abs/2210.13382

arxiv.org/abs/2310.02207

arxiv.org/abs/2310.06824

Actually that argument is literally Oxford philosophy professor Nick Bostrom’s argument in his simulation hypothesis given the unitary quality to the original and multiplicity potential of copies. If there can only be one original and can be more than one copy, then as long as there can and will be copies the odds are you are in a copy.