There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

01189998819991197253 ,
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

I never expected this. What a shame.

Edit: the ads part are not an acceptable add-on for me, as someone who respects privacy and foss. I don’t know of a single foss payment processor (lmk if one exists). A lot of people here are saying “pay what you want”, but it’s that way now, with GitHub donation links; we don’t need this in the fdroid app.

limerod ,

They want to add paid apps where you need to make a payment before getting access to the App. It’s not the same as the current donate approach

Carighan ,
@Carighan@lemmy.world avatar

I can’t see this go well for them.

I get the idea. I also get not wanting to restrict devs and hence offering all kinds of payment options. But I cannot see this be visible for them given their target audience.

themeatbridge ,

If they become the Play store, why wouldn’t I just use the Play store?

limerod ,

You value Foss software which does not track?

Advertisment part not withstanding

lazycouchpotato ,
@lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world avatar

Targeted advertising is a huge no. No more of that.

Static advertising I can accept, but then who’s responsible for vetting ads? I don’t want scams displayed everywhere.

Devs definitely need ways to support themselves and sustain development. I’ve shared this screenshot from the app Secure Tether before:

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/286e4de9-4ad7-4239-a4e5-3e9c0cfd70cd.png

I like to chip in a few bucks to my most used apps/services that are donationware, but after all the middlemen take their cut, the devs are left with peanuts. This IMO is the biggest hurdle when it comes to online monetization. A less expensive way to donate will certainly help.

Additionally, there are people who cannot or will not pay for apps, and I don’t want to exclude them from being able to use an app/service they need.

Monetization like how Reddit Gold was and how Discord Nitro is are some of my favorites. Few extra perks and cosmetic features for paying users. Free users are still able to use the main product at no cost and you can gift them Gold/Nitro if they aren’t able to purchase it themselves. I don’t know how that would translate into an app store model though.

flop_leash_973 ,

But in order to create a solution that will be mainstream enough to make in-roads into the hold Big Tech has on the market

Firstly, I doubt their users asked them to be “mainstream”, only their want for a piece of the app store profit pie is asking for that.

Secondly, if the only way to make in-roads on big techs hold on the market is to become just like them, then maybe they should be trying to find a better way.

F-droid is not going to beat the Play store at its own game. And it shows how naive the maintainers of F-droid are if they really believe that.

zecg ,
@zecg@lemmy.world avatar

Ads, no, are not ok. F-droid can fuck right off if an ad appears, I’ll just get apks from github

Lumisal ,

This is a good right to mention Obtanium, which is an app that basically streamlines that

limerod ,

Those same apks would also include ads. What makes you think if the developer has ads on fdroid, he won’t on github?

jadelord ,

If it is a pay what you want model I am all for it. This would be similar to how elementary OS st

The problem with a fixed price is you have to always calibrate it according to the economy of the user’s geolocation. What is cheap for a person from a developed world may be unaffordable for a third world county.

Landless2029 ,

I would be totally down with a pay what you want model with most proceeds going to devs.

Basically a prompt to donate to the devs with 5-10% going to the package manager.

Some apps I’ve used are totally worth $1-$5

smeeps ,

Maybe it should be a pay what you want but it doesn’t charge you for a week. So you can use the app and then decide whether to up the price if it’s useful or cancel the payment if it doesn’t work for you.

Landless2029 ,

I like the delayed charge since you can’t return a donation.

Something like a default of 14 days adjustable to 0-30 or reoccurring (default annual).

This is all turning into a nice idea into an alt android package manager you can sub to repos.

possiblylinux127 , (edited )

This is f*** up. I have no issues donating to my favorite apps. However what they are talking about it pure enshitification plus proprietary software

Also donations can absolutely work

blog.thunderbird.net/…/thunderbird-is-thriving-ou…

4tnGameDev ,

I’m a bit of a fence sitter on the actual issue, I love F-Droid as is and fear change, but I’ll say as someone who thinks they’ll release on Google Play in the general future, the thing that pisses me off most about Google Play is they have a “repetitive content policy” which disincentivizes you from releasing a full paid app and a demo app. The main issue is, I don’t want my app to categorize as “in-app purchases” if the only purchase is the “unlock full version”, because that doesn’t distinguish my app from any unethical whale-hunting casino-for-children microtransaction apps, and I don’t want my app to claim to be free if it’s just a demo.

At least, from a pro-user, communicate everything clearly, perspective, I feel that Google is compelling devs to dark-pattern-by-default on this subject.

LMK if I’m wrong about any of that.

MudMan ,

I'm not sure I can be as pliant as others here. Being less of an activist and more of a user of convenience, if I am making PayPal payments somebody better give me a reason why I'm not just using the same store that came in by default with my phone.

grue ,

What the fuck? Did F-Droid change ownership (sell out to a hedge fund or something)? Or did I somehow time-travel to April 1, or what?

possiblylinux127 ,

I really hope this is a poorly timed joke

garden ,
@garden@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Well, some members of F-Droid’s central board resigned nearly a year ago, citing issues that had been ongoing for a long time prior. Statement posted to Gitlab.

I’ve been slowly moving my app installations over to Obtainium ever since, and have been using NeoStore for the remaining F-Droid/Izzy installations.

leaky_shower_thought ,

i am good with the subscription and pay once approaches they mentioned.

the iffy portion is the in-app payment sdk. i hope f-droid will be the one providing those to have it standardized.

in-app ads are kinda okay. i won’t use said app, but if f-droid labels apps like those as how it labels apps with non-foss/features-you-may-not-like, it should be okay.

possiblylinux127 ,

In app ads are very much not ok as they are often targeted and serve no benefit to the user. I have no issue with a donate button popup with a link but we already have Google play for spyware.

cupcakezealot ,
@cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

i’m fine with it as long as the privacy labels remain front and centre when downloading; especially if they clearly mark which apps are ad supported, subscription based, etc and don’t prioritize them over foss/ad free

otoh, i use neo store so it probably won’t matter

vomitaur ,

pretty sure the venn diagram of f-droid users and adblocking users is such a huge overlap that this may not pay off too well.

possiblylinux127 ,

I might uninstall F-droid today…

mrvictory1 ,

If they added ads I probably wouldn’t even notice because of ad blocker lol.

Carighan ,
@Carighan@lemmy.world avatar

This is about them offering the developers of ads they deploy in fdroid options for revenue. Not ads in fdroid itself.

yuuunikki ,

If anything this would just give me suggestions on apks of paid apps to sideload for free

possiblylinux127 ,

It should uphold free software and user freedom. If an app developer chooses to abuse user freedom the app should be pulled (and possibly forked) like Simple model tools.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •