There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

IsThisAnAI ,

I can’t help but laugh with this post in this sub.

Paying for media content is somehow dystopian 🤣

OHHHH GOD NO! YT WON’T LET ME FREELOAD CONTENT, I’M BEING ACCOSTED!

madcaesar ,

Google cornered the video market and killed all competition by mining all of our data and selling it for years.

Now that they are too big to fail they want to turn around and extort us all. The price for premium is NOT reasonable.

This isn’t some mom and pop company trying to serve videos. They abused their size and are now abusing it again.

And the fact that there’s people like you defending them is a problem. We have to fight the mega corp and the bootlickers in our ranks.

ripcord ,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Wait, how did they kill all competition by mining our data? Because they could do things cheaper than compwtitors, or…?

madcaesar ,

The literarily made money off our backs by selling our privacy. Using those I’ll-gotten gians they pushed out the competition.

They didn’t do things “cheaper” they just stole from all of us and now they want more money on top.

ripcord ,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

You seem like you’re getting distracted here. I’m asking about the claim about them killing off competition by stealing our data. Can you go into more detail on how that worked, how the stealing of our data killed off the competition?

Nindelofocho ,

I can probably help with some of the explanation on this. Not necessarily the data stealing side of things but definitely how they killed off competition. Youtube operated at a loss for a looong time while providing a stable and well functioning platform where creators could make a decent amount of money this resulted in year over year userbase growth. This not only made it harder for other platforms to break into the market as no creator would want to spend time making content on a platform with less users but also the other platforms did not have the capital behind them to operate at such a loss so they die out or they get purchased by google/youtube for a bargain and get shut down. Now youtubes userbase is so captive that they are pretty much free to essentially abuse their users almost as much as they want because as a viewer theres not really any other platform out there that has the creators you watch and as a creator theres no platform thatll get you enough views to be sustainable. Its a cycle that has to be kicked off by something big like youtube going down because thats the only way users are going to migrate.

You kind of see something similar with big box stores, companies moving into areas or even just gas stations. Big gas station companies arent in the gas business, they are in the real estate and convenience store business. They often sell gas at a loss even though they have their own fuel logistics supply chain. Other stations who rely on income from fuel sales and less so convenience sales struggle because they cant secure the selection in the store and dont have their own fuel logistics. Many go belly up unless they have something unique that keeps people coming in like restaurants or a unique drink selection. Once most if not all the local stores go out of business then the big store prices rise and the consumer is abused.

Google has stated that theyve operated youtube at a loss for a very long time but (and this is my speculation) its been done intentionally to edge out the competition and retain sympathy from its userbase to justify the abuse. Youtube is making massive revenue but they are spending it. If google/alphabet didnt see it as a profit stream it would have been killed a long time ago. My theory is they are sorta playing the game from both sides and overspending on overhead and padding the execs wallets more and more just to tell investors and shareholders that while revenue has increased, so has overhead/labor/etc just to take home their own fat paycheck while also milking their userbase for as much as they can. At some point its gunna break but execs have already made out on their goods. Yes video hosting and platform development is expensive but I do believe youtube is not spending most of its money there and that it doesent need all the overhead spending think of how crappy their content review system is. Nothing gets seen by a human except in very specific circumstances

ripcord ,
@ripcord@lemmy.world avatar

Ok, thanks. So because they were subsidizing video costs by selling out data.

That’s what I meant when I said “cheaper” and he pushed back, but maybe that wasn’t clear enough.

I’m curious if there’s data for how much this was a factor, vs the traditional “giant company with deep pockets is willing to fund at a loss to grow market share” situation.

Either way, I probably understand what he meant now which is what I was after, thanks.

ZeroHora ,
@ZeroHora@lemmy.ml avatar

At the same time they are enforcing the ban on adblocks they are creating solutions for sponsor blocks to skip the ads that actually bring some money to youtube creators.

Funny how the paying for media content works, you can pay youtube but not the creator of that content, the creator himself gets next to nothing if the youtube algorithm doesn’t favour the content. Not a boring dystopia at all.

Honytawk ,

I wouldn’t mind paying, if they didn’t took away my right to privacy and stopped scraping all of my devices like freaking malware. Even if you don’t use any of their services.

As long as they do that, I feel no remorse not paying for their content.

Nindelofocho ,

You’re minimizing the abuse. Used to be fine with ads when it was 1-2 max but then it got abusive and greedy. Someone who yells at you once or twice may just be angry, upset, or so on. Someone who yells at you constantly is abusive

IsThisAnAI ,

I can’t honestly believe you just equated more ads on TV to abuse.

Nindelofocho ,

Gaslighting is another way people justify abuse

IsThisAnAI ,

I don’t think that term means what you think it means.

FIST_FILLET ,

oh no, anyway now you have more time to watch stuff that people put actual talent into like movies and tv shows and documentaries (this is a jab at youtube in general and not this specific video)

AngryMob ,

Theres plenty of high quality content on youtube though. You gotta wade through wall to wall youtube cringe to find it, but once you got a list of good subs, that problem disappears. The idea that youtube is solely garbage low effort content is so outdated

coffinwood ,

So you neither pay with money nor by watching ads for a very expensive to maintain service, but you won’t leave it be either.

I know I’m making myself Unpopular here, but what is it that you’re bringing to the table? Currently you cost YouTube money because streaming video is really expensive. You block out all the ads so every creator is cut off monetization too. This is not a publicly funded library (yet).

LazerDickMcCheese ,

Your words are poopoo

TragicNotCute ,
@TragicNotCute@lemmy.world avatar

Streaming data is expensive, but when you’re vertically integrated to the point Google is, it starts to get significantly cheaper. I’ve been paying creators directly through Patreon for literal years now, and I’ve said before I’d be happy to pay for my usage on Google (including a markup), but paying a flat fee and giving a handful of creators a watch a few cents while Google keeps the lion’s share isn’t good enough for me.

Sabata11792 ,

It’s not my job to fit into a mega corporations business model.

coffinwood ,

as long as it’s not your salary that gets ad-blocked.

Sabata11792 ,

Thats an HR issue at a mega corporation I don’t work for. Not my problem they are mismanaged and poorly scaled.

capital ,

As soon as YT started blocking blockers, I created a new Firefox profile with only Bitwarden (just need that everywhere) and uBlock Origin ONLY. Using that has never failed me once this whole time.

When I forget to access YT through my special profile (and therefore only utilize those two plugins) I do see errors. I assume this is due to either uMatrix, AdNauseum or some combination of the two.

hahattpro ,

Try Brave browser. It work

rustyfish ,
@rustyfish@lemmy.world avatar

Yup. Brave works great on iPhone, too. PiP, no ads, even downloads work fine. And thanks to Airdrop I can watch ad free on TV.

Until yesterday I had a cheap Premium subscription going on but YouTube cancelled it because they found out I don’t live in Asia. Like fuck, it’s not about the money. 5? Maybe 6 or 7? That would have been fine by me. But 20 fucking bucks a month for that? Yeah, nah. Either fix your prices or I will continue to look for workarounds.

Andromxda ,
@Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Yattee with this guide is another good option for iOS, iPadOS and tvOS (you could also use it on macOS, but I prefer FreeTube or just using Piped or Invidious in the browser). It’s also fully open source: github.com/yattee/yattee

rustyfish ,
@rustyfish@lemmy.world avatar

Nice! Thank you very much!

I am already tinkering with my options and I will certainly try this out as soon as I make it home.

decivex ,

Shame about the crypto bs and homophobia though.

remer ,

Homophobia? I missed that. What happened?

decivex ,

Brendan Eich founded Brave after being booted from Mozilla over his opposition to same-sex marriage.

Jimbo ,
@Jimbo@yiffit.net avatar

Browsers be homophobic now? Wild times

Andromxda ,
@Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Not the browser itself, but the CEO of the company that develops it. (He used to work at Mozilla, but had to resign because of his homophobic actions) cnet.com/…/mozilla-ceo-eich-resigns-after-controv…

Jimbo ,
@Jimbo@yiffit.net avatar

Yea I know, it was a joke

FlashMobOfOne ,
@FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world avatar

Switch over to Brave browser. Its native adblock works better than uBlock anyway.

lightnsfw ,

I was getting a “this video is private, log in to watch it” banner on everything yesterday with Brave. The videos still played but I wonder if it’s related to OPs issue.

Lumisal ,
  1. it does not
  2. the crypto bro scam browser I will l would now trust less than Chrome after that whole debacle

Edit: oh and the homophobia too, and I think there’s one other thing

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •