That’s what I did last year, got it done about a month before a plane trip I had coming. I still got sick despite wearing an N95 on both flights, but it tested negative for covid.
Now how the heck do I get the booster without having to sign up on a website and agree to an arbitration clause? Because hell no, I’m not going to agree to that.
I’ve usually just walked into a local pharmacy and asked if they have the booster. My local pharmacy just has a standard paper form for all vaccination (flu, shingles, covid, etc) walk ins, there is no website or arbitration clause or even specific covid form. You might want to try a different pharmacy if that has been your experience.
I just hope they don’t cost an exorbitant price now that the national health emergency has ended here. It was really nice being able to get them for free because I am poor.
I bet it’ll be the same as flu shots. It’s not like those are actually “free.” Someone is paying for them, whether it’s insurance, the hospital/clinic itself, or more typically a governmental agency (usually state or local). I’ve paid a small co-pay for a flu shot before, but most times it’s “free” because my insurance covers it.
Only time I’ve really paid for a vaccination was right before I travelled overseas. Needed a couple specialized immunizations and think that was like $75 total.
One of the biggest failings in Western economics is the prevalence for across the board percentage pay rises. People getting paid £40k get double those on £20k when both get an equal amount in pay percentage increase. This has been part of the reason why top bands in large companies have gained such huge pay scales. Percentage rises are nothing like an equal pay rise. It is way past time unions recognised this.
Kind of Kudos to the Chinese for this. I hope they see fit to roll it out among some of the more powerful families in China also, and not just use it to claw back some money from the middle class.
The other half of the problem is if a CEO ever said “We’re going to have lower profits this quarter because we started paying everyone more” that CEO will be locked out and that’s if the people making those decisions aren’t sued first by the board
I haven’t gotten a booster in awhile and no one I know wear a mask anymore where I live. Plus kids are back in school and my eldest niece and nephew live with me; they are walking plague carriers.
They will argue. Pay rise for everyone. Will nject huge amounts of money into the econ. Raising inflation. While this means the low earners gain or lose little. Amd the rich lose much.
It will totally destroy those that cannot work or earn at all. IE retired poor or unemployed.
One. Lets face it. No econ can handle such a huge raise in income. Without it seriously effecting the internal market.
And that huge increase will slowly if at all move to those not currently earning. IE retired or disabled etc.
But even if the econ could manage it. By for example borrowing to raise unemployed incomes while things settle.
Those making the decisions will worry more about the effect on their econ and currency compared to other nations. Not doing the same thing.
In genral governments tend to ( to some extent rightly) value their currencies buying power with other nations. More then the internal markets.
At this time in history. No nation is truly 100% self sufficient. Mainly most nations over the last 50 years have not tried to be. So it can be seen as governments own choice.
But huge changes in the value of a currency has a huge negative effect on the ability for any nations citizen’s to thrive.
This not only effects the poor drematically. But often more to the worry of governments. The rich and government spending power overall.
The later is a death blow for democratic nations. But even more so for a nation that has been using its buying power to position itself in the world for decades. Such as China.
Did you even read the article? The article says the plan includes raises for the lower and middle paid employees that is being paid for by cuts to the upper executives. So they’re doing exactly what you proposed
Under the plan, the salary package for employees below mid-level managers was raised by about 10% to 15%, and salaries for higher-level managers were reduced by a similar range, a second source said.
It would be nice if they could package an annual booster with the flu shot, though I'm not sure of there are interaction issues. I got them both at the same time last year though and just had a mild cramp in my arm which is pretty typical for a flu shot on its own.
Eris fortunately doesn't appear to be more virulent than omicron was, but also doesn't seem to be weaking further as was the trend for the last few varients. It seems mutation with increased transmission over time seems to be the trend.
Just add it to the annual flu list and make your choice as to whether you want to get your shot every year or not. Not a big deal.
Next year. Should have combo shots next year. The hope was to have them ready this year, but we’ll be in the middle of flu season this year when they’re expected to be approved.
Of course with anything, unexpected things can derail that plan, but everything stay the course, one shot should be next year.
Various factors can play on if the place you go to will have the combo shot though, so there’s that too.
BEIJING, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Bank of China Ltd (601988.SS), China’s fourth-largest lender by assets, has launched a countrywide exercise to reduce the salary gaps among its employees and mid- and high-level managers in response to Beijing’s “common prosperity” drive, three sources with knowledge of the matter said.
President Xi Jinping launched the common prosperity drive in 2021 as an effort to reduce income inequality, which could threaten long-term economic growth and even the legitimacy of Communist Party rule.
The move follows pay cuts being made at investment banks such as China International Capital Corp (CICC) (3908.HK).
Commercial banks have suffered record low profit margins due to disruptions from the embattled property sector and local government debt risks in a faltering economy.
The sources said Bank of China has launched an internal “salary management system reform plan”, after an inspection team under the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection found the bank’s pay system has issues of “wealth inequality” in several rounds of investigations since late last year.
The move also comes as a surprise to state bankers, who generally earn less than peers at investment banks and other local financial institutions and who were spared from pay cuts last year after Beijing called for the promotion of common prosperity.
reuters.com
Newest