There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

files.catbox.moe

Kolanaki , to lemmyshitpost in Robots are the future
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

Jackson Pollock Bot, away!

Fuckfuckmyfuckingass , to noncredibledefense in Average Tuesday on NCD
@Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world avatar

This is legitimately one of my favorite films. They definitely were on drugs making this one, but good drugs. Exceedingly good drugs.

hydroptic OP ,

It’s like pure concentrated essence of 70’s. I actually really do like it too; like I said in another comment it’s not what I’d call a good movie as such, but the ridiculous camp is part of the fun for me. What’s not to love about a weird-as-shit 70’s dystopian scifi romp that’s like Elysium on tons of LSD?

WhyDoYouPersist , to lemmyshitpost in We need this level of energy. All the time...

This slaps

CuttingBoard , to cat in Shadow tiger; hunter of dust bunnies; raider of toilet papers

We call one of our dogs “the toilet paper bandit”.

son_named_bort , to lemmyshitpost in 'Murica
ThatWeirdGuy1001 , to lemmyshitpost in Thou'st see-eth me rolleth, thou'st hateth
@ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world avatar

You made me remember this exists so now everyone else has to suffer.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d18282d4-a4fe-4045-b3ed-d05697154d04.jpeg

cmbabul , to lemmyshitpost in I beg you, someone, make an edit of this clip!

Someone use an AI to combine this and the gif of Obama kicking the door in

Mouselemming , to aww in ScoobySnacks lost their ball under the bed this morning

Exactly the look and tone of my cat when she loses her ponytail holder under the base of the chair. Use your super Human Powers, mom!

Nima , to aww in ScoobySnacks lost their ball under the bed this morning
@Nima@leminal.space avatar

poor baby. he sounds a little bit like a clucking chicken XD

negativenull OP ,
@negativenull@lemmy.world avatar

He’s great at sounding pathetic when he wants

CptEnder , to noncredibledefense in I believe this is what the kids call a pro gamer move

Bruh someone toggled Halo physics lmao

zakobjoa , to noncredibledefense in I believe this is what the kids call a pro gamer move
@zakobjoa@lemmy.world avatar

Set SVBIED to airburst.

PyroNeurosis ,

Shrapnel radius must be incredible!

mrspaz , to lemmyshitpost in Duality of old men

“There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. But there are few old, bold pilots.”

JoeKrogan , to games in Larian Studios has two major games in development and opens new studio in Warsaw
@JoeKrogan@lemmy.world avatar

Good for them

01189998819991197253 , to games in Marvels Rivals requires creators to sign a contract that removes your right to give a negative review in order to access the playtest
@01189998819991197253@infosec.pub avatar

It did say “subjective negative reviews”. I would take that to mean that strictly objective negative reviews are perfectly acceptable.

HonoraryMancunian , to pics in Kummakivi is a 500.000 kg rock in Finland that has been balancing on another rock for 11.000 years

I’m not convinced that weighs 500 tons, that’s the same as at least 65 of the largest African elephants or 2.5 of the largest blue whales

SkyeStarfall , (edited )

After some googling, some of the heavier rock types are 3g/cm^3, which is 3000kg/m^3

If we use the person as a rough ruler of 1.6m, the rock is about 5 person wide, and 3 person high (eye measure), give or take. And if we say it’s 3 person deep, then it has a rough mass of 5331.63000 = 216 000 kg, which is in the same order of magnitude.

Close enough to check out, I’d say.

Edit: I realized since the actual ruler we use is 1.6m (assumed), it should be multiplied by 1.6 three times (one for each dimension/length), not just once. If we do that, we end up with 921 600 kg instead, putting 500 000 kg well within the range of possibilities from a quick calculation.

Edit 2: as pointed out below, the actual correct estimation would be 553 tons

Hule ,

You got me confused.

5331.63000

is the same as

[(51.6) + (31.6) + (3*1.6)]*3000

SkyeStarfall ,

5331.6 is not the same as (51.6)(31.6)(31.6), however

The reason we multiply with 1.6 on every dimension is because the ruler we use is 1.6m long. We effectively create a new unit, and have to convert. If a length is 5 person wide, then in reality it’s 5*1.6 = 8 meters long, where 1.6 is the conversion ratio from the unit of ‘person’ to the unit of ‘meter’. And this applies for every individual measurement.

Also, 5331.6 is not the same as (51.6)+(31.6)+(31.6) in the first place

Hule ,

Yes, i must have been sleeping while looking at the numbers :)

protist , (edited )

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Hule ,

    You’re right…

    MenacingPerson ,

    Um, wouldn’t we be dividing by 1.6 instead of multiplying?

    HonoraryMancunian ,

    Your edit is correct except I get 553 tons! I’m still shocked it’d easily tip the scales vs 2 large blue whales

    Edit: ahh you accidentally did 5x5x3 instead of 5x3x3

    EddoWagt ,

    I’m still shocked it’d easily tip the scales vs 2 large blue whales

    Rocks are dense and blubber not so much, I suppose

    SkyeStarfall ,

    Oh, whoops, I did make a mistake! Thanks for the correction

    MehBlah ,

    Useless. We all want something standard. Like how many pygmy marmosets that is.

    MadBob ,

    Morning, yes, I’ll have 65 of your largest African elephants please.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines