There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

bbc.co.uk

authed , to worldnews in Five rail workers killed in Italy after being hit by train

Woah that sucks

robocall , to worldnews in Five rail workers killed in Italy after being hit by train
@robocall@lemmy.world avatar

Very sad to hear.

cr3eperall , to worldnews in Five rail workers killed in Italy after being hit by train

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • TWeaK ,

    It sounds like they were working at a station and the train was passing through, my guess is they put the train on the wrong tracks or something.

    TheFonz ,

    It was a joke about the trolley problem (philosophy) although internet can never miss a joke done in bad taste

    interdimensionalmeme ,

    I blame the non-interventionist for not getting involved and stopping this accident even if it might have killed one other person.

    autotldr Bot , to worldnews in Five rail workers killed in Italy after being hit by train

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    At least five people have died after a train hit railway workers at high speed close to a station in Italy.

    The workers, aged between 22 and 52, were replacing part of a track outside the northern city of Turin when they were killed.

    They had been working on the line between Turin and Milan when the empty passenger train went through Brandizzo station at a reported 160km/h (100mph).

    In a statement, Italian railway network (RFI) expressed its “deep sorrow” for the incident.

    Italian reports said the workers had been replacing about 10m of track when the empty train transporting a dozen wagons went through Brandizzo station at high speed.

    The mayor of Brandizzo, a small town to the north-east of Turin, said he would wait until the outcome of the inquiry but a communication error could not be ruled out.


    The original article contains 223 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 37%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    nepenthes , to worldnews in US health department recommends looser restrictions on cannabis
    @nepenthes@lemmy.world avatar

    I’m in Canada, where the bless-ed weed has been legal, federally, for five years. Please do it, USians! We need research done on the myriad of benefits medicinal marijuana has to offer.

    AnotherPerson ,
    @AnotherPerson@lemmy.world avatar

    And we need research for any detrimental effects as well. We need to know where the benefit ends and the harm starts.

    mayo ,

    It is nice having a more personal freedom in what I choose to do in my spare time.

    Also now I don’t need to smoke I can just have gummies occasionally.

    doggle , to worldnews in Burger King faces legal claim saying Whopper is too small

    Who cares about the size?

    I want a burger that doesn’t taste like kerosene, with vegetables that were grown in the last decade, served by someone who isn’t contemplating stabbing me.

    And can I get cheese on that?

    Gork ,

    And can I get cheese on that?

    Will pasteurized process cheese product do?

    FooBarrington ,

    I’d like to know what I’ll get before I order. If the advertisement shows the burger with some size, I expect the same size when I order. Why should I get a smaller burger than the advertisement shows?

    shirro , to worldnews in Burger King faces legal claim saying Whopper is too small

    It was decades ago but Burger King was a bit of a staple for me for a few years when I lived close to a franchise operator that was consistent. It has been awhile and I knew things had gone downhill and some of the franchise operators are very shitty but I was shocked last time we went. The restaurant was filthy and the tables and floors were covered in food. The burgers looked to be thrown together out of bin leftovers. Can’t say I blame staff for the lack of enthusiasm given their employer has a known history of wage theft. We couldn’t tell the differences between the more expensive special and regular whopper so took the mess to the counter to ask what the fuck we were given and why it looked nothing like the photo. The whole family swore off them for life. Never going back.

    jeffw , to worldnews in US health department recommends looser restrictions on cannabis
    @jeffw@lemmy.world avatar

    My totally sober brain read “loser restrictions” and was kinda offended that they we’re coming for me

    iHUNTcriminals ,

    Same, maybe it’s a weed head thing.

    Rukmer ,

    I read it as “looser restrictions on cannibals” due to bad eyesight, and laughed out loud figuring it was a typo before I saw the joint picture.

    autotldr Bot , to worldnews in US health department recommends looser restrictions on cannabis

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The US Department of Health and Human Services has called on the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to loosen federal rules on cannabis.

    Cannabis is currently classified as a schedule 1 drug under the Controlled Substances Act, meaning it has no medical use and a high chance of abuse.

    Last year, President Joe Biden asked his attorney general and health secretary to oversee a review on whether cannabis should be listed as a less serious drug.

    “As part of this process, HHS conducted a scientific and medical evaluation for consideration by DEA,” the agency said in a statement.

    Some advocates have pushed the administration to de-schedule the drug, meaning repeal it from the Controlled Substances Act and regulate it in the same way as alcohol or tobacco.

    Currently, most marijuana businesses in the US are forced to operate in cash, due to tax laws banning banks from handling money generated from certain drug sales.


    The original article contains 391 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    doom_and_gloom , (edited ) to worldnews in Beekeepers to the rescue after 5 million bees fall off truck in Canada
    @doom_and_gloom@lemmy.ml avatar

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • notacat ,

    Farmed honey bees can actually harm local pollinators through competing for resources.

    doom_and_gloom , (edited )
    @doom_and_gloom@lemmy.ml avatar

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • explodicle ,

    Why were they already dying out?

    doom_and_gloom , (edited )
    @doom_and_gloom@lemmy.ml avatar

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • explodicle ,

    Those aren’t human interference?

    Amaltheamannen ,

    There’s also the destruction of their territory and pesticides, all caused by humans.

    kite , to worldnews in Blue supermoon: World gazes at rare lunar phenomenon

    I can’t see squat, there’s a hurricane outside.

    Buffalobuffalo , to worldnews in Blue supermoon: World gazes at rare lunar phenomenon

    “Rare lunar phenomenon” that happens every couple of years, and is only relevant because there are 27ish days between a new moon and 30-31 days in a month. The moon is cool and I like looking at it, but a “blue moon” is a quirk of our calendar not the moon being interesting.

    FaceDeer ,
    @FaceDeer@kbin.social avatar

    Even the "supermoon" part is really pretty bland. The Moon looks very slightly larger. Imperceptible without some kind of visual reference that you've calibrated beforehand.

    Just look at it through some binoculars and you'll be way more impressed.

    library_napper , to worldnews in Burger King faces legal claim saying Whopper is too small
    @library_napper@monyet.cc avatar

    Or you could eat something that’s not going to kill you and the environment.

    nestEggParrot ,

    What can you eat without killing the environment?

    silent_water ,
    @silent_water@hexbear.net avatar

    meat is much less sustainable than non-animal food sources

    nestEggParrot ,

    By what metric? Do you mean its far more polluting than the rest because sustainable means something different.

    UlyssesT ,

    False equivalencies are lazy and dishonest. Less harm is still less harm, and still plausibly closer to sustainability than YOLO BURN EVERYTHING DOWN FOR BORGER.

    nestEggParrot ,
    1. I didn’t disagree with plants generally being less env friendly.
    2. Most CO2 emmision wrt to meat is misleading because they are part of the carbon cycle. Pumping out oil is not comparable here.
    3. A lot of fossil fuel is utilised in the cultivation, storage, transportation of various seasonal crops, often across the world. Same as for meat. Generalizing plant vs meat often hides those behind moral arguments.
    4. What false equivalency? Polluting is not the same as sustainable? Sustainable how? Animal husbandry has been practiced for millennias and in many places is the main food source where agriculture isn’t feasible.

    Making a wide general statement and nitpicking in the arument is lazy and dishonest. Atleast read what I was responding to.

    UlyssesT ,

    Making a wide general statement and nitpicking in the arument is lazy and dishonest. Atleast read what I was responding to.

    You’re too high on your own farts and hypocritically ignoring what I had said to meaningfully respond to, but I’ll try it anyway for anyone else reading.

    moral arguments

    Cultivating meat costs more energy (and generally has more carbon emissions) than using the same amount of land to grow edible plants. It’s a basic rule of energy conservation, not a “moral argument.”

    www.khanacademy.org/…/food-chains-food-webs

    It looks more like you want your burger treats to go uncriticized until and unless some impossibly perfect alternative has absolutely zero-to-negative emissions. That way, your burger treats continue to go uncriticized for all of the forseeable future.

    nestEggParrot ,

    Your comment consisted of 2 points:

    1. Calling me lazy an dishonest for asking a clarification on an ambiguous term ‘sustainable’. I hadn’t made any claims to be called at.
    2. You again used sustainable to which i defined and responded how animal husbandry is infact sustainable.

    So how have I not responded to your comment?

    Its you pulling out accusations and imagining up arguments that was never made and making personal attacks rather than stick to making valid arguments and address the actual points being made.

    Your argument about energy fails to distinguish between the typical carbon cycle of moving through plants animals and decomposition incontrast with the cabon introduced through fossil fuels. This was what I pointed out previously too.

    And we cant just plop down plants that are human digestable in many places where we grow the feed for cattles. Correct me on that.

    UlyssesT ,

    Spare me the claim that your sneering passive aggressive sanctimony (claiming that energy waste and environmental damage from factory meat production is a “moral argument”) is somehow superior because you used more Reddit words to dress it up.

    You used false equivalencies to hide your consumer-brained selfishness to try to justify the status quo. There was nothing more to it and there is nothing more worth saying to you.

    library_napper ,
    @library_napper@monyet.cc avatar

    Plants

    nestEggParrot ,

    Plants are part of that environment and you have to kill them to eat? *unless you are picking off fallen ripe fruits like roadkill eaters.

    Also cultivation of those plants you eat are done in large cleared areas and are destructive to the environment.

    AntiOutsideAktion ,
    @AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net avatar

    You can’t spell harm reduction without “harm” so why bother? smuglord

    library_napper ,
    @library_napper@monyet.cc avatar

    These things can be quantified in terms of co2 equivalents and water used per kg of food produced.

    Eating plants (even root veggies when killing them) is magnitudes better for the planet than eating animals that eat plants.

    nestEggParrot ,

    While i agree to the points it still stands that the majority of CO2 and methane(a more potent greenhouse gas) are part of the carbon cycle that has been relatively stable.

    It is not comparable to the dumping of carbon from fossil fuels. This is something many collate together and make disingenuous arguments. Correct me where I am wrong in understanding this.

    One additional point(though i have no exact statistics) per kg isnt comparable between plants and meat. Large portions of plant are not edible and used as fertilizers or cattle feed at best. Meat is also energy dense and hence required in far less quantities than carbohydrates.

    Not to mention water isnt equally distributed. Doing intensive agriculture in drought prone areas are far worse than cattle raised in water rich regions.

    I would be interestsed in finding a study that takes a wide array of factors and calculates the effects.

    synicalx1 ,

    It’s true, just yesterday I saw a rogue whopper starting a forest fire

    Jake_Farm , to worldnews in Canada warns LGBT travellers of US risks
    @Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz avatar

    Does the US need to put out a warning to disabled travelers? Go to Canada and they will tell you to kill yourself.

    Metal_Zealot , to worldnews in Canada warns LGBT travellers of US risks
    @Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml avatar

    Canada should issue an advisory for people travelling to Alberta

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines