There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

@jonathanhorowi1@sciences.social cover
@jonathanhorowi1@sciences.social avatar

jonathanhorowi1

@[email protected]

#sociology dude. Extremely dull, shockingly boring and bland.

If this feed annoys you (possible, I suppose) or bores you (extremely likely) I give you full permission to unfollow me and/or mute me. I don't judge, I promise!

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

jonathanhorowi1 , to random
@jonathanhorowi1@sciences.social avatar

Follow up: One of the papers I resubmitted after an R&R where I had to write a 6,300 word memo was rejected. One of the reviewers decided that the language and paper structure that he (it is probably a he) suggested that we use last time wasn't good enough, and that we should rewrite the whole thing again.

https://sciences.social/@jonathanhorowi1/111625280964642815

jonathanhorowi1 OP ,
@jonathanhorowi1@sciences.social avatar

In case you're wondering what my first experience at Sociological Perspectives was like:

  1. All R&Rs, no matter how much work needs to be done, must be returned within 60 days. The editor is sometimes willing to give you a 3 or 4 day extension, and that's it.
  2. The reviewers (I had) are micromanagers who want to rewrite the paper for you, and in at least one case, will forget what they told you to do the last time.
  3. The editor gives no guidance whatsoever.
    @sociology
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines