There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Zimited

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

Thank you for sharing.

Hm, in the first link, the journalist seems to have contributed to the incentivization of giving people the power to find and try to harm/kill Elon. I personally feel that directly incentivizing and feeding information for possible murder of an individual is one of the few things I would agree with keeping away from the app myself.

As for the second link it reads like a red flag for me. The reasoning to the ban is not there. And any estimates of why fall short with obscurity. At least within’ the article. Generally when something is obscure I assume the worst. But part of me wonders if details were left out from the article. I’d need to do more research. Looks bad for Elon though.

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

Yeah, that is a really bad look for Elon. I agree.

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

Do you have sources that show he intentionally censored voices? He would be a huge hypocrite depending on how that was done.

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

What makes you think he is deliberately spreading disinformation?

He says what he feels. It is a responsibility for the people to not take everything he says as fact. Its like talking to a friend who says some wild shit to get it off their chest. Doesn’t mean you need to change your opinion because of it.

I see the theoretical idea of him intentionally trying to shape the opinion of his sheep enough to do what he wants for him. But I don’t personally buy it. Albeit it is good to be aware of the possibility.

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

If in this case the power allows democracy to function better through clearer and less muted digital freedom of speech, thats a better power than anything else. If thats what it takes to make the averages of society think a more unified, less biased and obscured thought again and regain its control over the real power that is greedy money to the few, then fuck it so be it.

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

If X perpetuates a lie and doesn’t have the facilitation to allow a variety of perspectives and opinions to hold the lie accountable, that is an echo chamber and I’d agree it would be a huge problem. Elon said every person should be allowed to speak for the most part on X. If that saying holds any merit, I assume X lives up to that eventually. If it doesn’t I’m on you guys’ side about X.

I feel if Elon Musk said covid was a lie and people took only his word for it, that is on them. Its another story entirely if there was no other trustworthy source of information or data. USA seems to struggle with that these days, so I understand how it went so wrong with Covid in some places. But yeah, a person in this case would win the game of natural selection by not only going off of what one dude/source says (probably in a casual, low effort manner at that).

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

So you are basically saying to mute the opposition to the agenda of power?

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

Wait, you’re saying its not possible for people to call him out for being wrong on X?

Zimited , (edited ) to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

Truth in this case, comes from the ability to be proven wrong. If they removed it, the truth wouldn’t have a chance to be relevant and challenge the wrong statement. I assume that is what Elon has in mind when he considers his site to be more truthful. Much on the common internet these days gets shut down and removed before even being able to be challenged. Like on Reddit. Which ironically leads to less truth, since less people have their opinions challenged and are instead removed, or the challenge is removed.

Zimited , to news in Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

He says what he feels and its not always factually correct. Sounds like a human to me. If people believe everything he says thats on them.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •