There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

@Raisinbrand@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Raisinbrand

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Raisinbrand ,
@Raisinbrand@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Yes it would. If wireguard is hosted in a vps, they can setup a client on their home network and mobile device, bypassing their home and isp nat.

Raisinbrand ,
@Raisinbrand@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I think you have a misunderstanding about wireguard clients.

As long as the server isn’t behind a cgnat, a connection from the client to the server can be made. It does not matter if the client is behind a cgnat or not. If that were true, privacy vpns like proton and mullvad would not work.

That said, tailscale is easy to setup compared to a wireguard tunnel, but wireguard has potentially more performance because tailscale uses wireguard-go rather than wireguard kernel.

Raisinbrand ,
@Raisinbrand@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I believe performance is situationally dependent, so it may or may not be faster, but it theoretically is. I personally choose wireguard over tailscale because it’s one less 3rd party involved, not for potential performance increases.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •