There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

@Lupposofi@mementomori.social cover
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

Lupposofi

@[email protected]

Olin tieteenfilosofi ja tietoteoreetikko. Opetin kriittistä ajattelua yliopistossa. (Re)tired. Ihmettelen elämää lähinnä Lupposofina (ks. kotisivu), ja ajoittain yhä opin.

Vältän pönkittämästä uutismedian luomaa ja ylläpitämää ajan tasaa.

Seurailemiani sivustoja:

https://plato.stanford.edu/new.html
https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic
https://social-epistemology.com/
https://philosophyofbrains.com/
https://www.alzforum.org/all-news
https://bios.fi/#blogi
https://journal.fi/

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

imperfectcognitions , to philosophy
@imperfectcognitions@mas.to avatar

On the blog today, Anneli Jefferson and Katrina Sifferd discuss their recent on paper on the role of audience and feedback in the development of moral agency. @philosophy
http://imperfectcognitions.blogspot.com/2024/06/responsible-agency-and-importance-of.html

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
lisabortolotti , to philosophy
@lisabortolotti@fediscience.org avatar

Tomorrow: excited to participate in the last meeting of Ema Sullivan-Bissett and Anna Ichino’s project on conspiracy theories and delusions https://www.emasullivan-bissett.com/workshop-conspiracies-and-delusions.html @philosophy

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
jeffgreene , to psychology
@jeffgreene@mastodon.social avatar

What do we risk when we treat AI like it can “think”? Find out at Bemusings, where I synthesize and share research on thriving in the digital world. https://bemusings.ghost.io/ai-objectivity-as-a-smile-on-a-dog/

@edutooters @psychology @academicchatter

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

@jeffgreene @edutooters @psychology @academicchatter I'd love to read the article, but cannot. Only the abstract and references are available sans subscription or institutional access.

bibliolater , to philosophy
@bibliolater@qoto.org avatar

"Can arguments change minds? Philosophers like to think that they can. However, a wealth of empirical evidence suggests that arguments are not very efficient tools to change minds."

Catarina Dutilh Novaes, VII—Can Arguments Change Minds?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 123, Issue 2, July 2023, Pages 173–198, https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoad006 @philosophy

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
lisabortolotti , to philosophy
@lisabortolotti@fediscience.org avatar

For here is an open access paper coauthored with Rachel Gunn: can delusions play a protective role? https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11097-017-9555-6 @philosophy

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

@lisabortolotti @philosophy No doubt they can. What scares me are the long-term epistemic costs globally. The same goes with virtual reality, role-playing, immersive games, etc.

analyticus , to philosophy
@analyticus@mastodon.social avatar

11 Philosophical Razors to Simplify Your Life.

Philosophical razors simplify decision-making by “shaving off” possibilities and explanations with a low probability of being useful or true. Every day we’re confronted with vast amounts of information and problems that are begging for evaluation and solutions. The ability to eliminate unlikely ones by way of taking mental shortcuts is a uniquely human superpower.

https://themindcollection.com/philosophical-razors

@philosophy @philosophie @philosophyofmind

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
lisabortolotti , to philosophy
@lisabortolotti@fediscience.org avatar

New post on the EPIC blog: Ian James Kidd recommends caution in the use of the notion of epistemic injustice https://epistemicinjusticeinhealthcareproject.blogspot.com/2024/01/epistemic-injustice-caution-and.html @philosophy

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
PhilosophicalPsychology , to psychology
@PhilosophicalPsychology@fediscience.org avatar

Latest papers: Francesco Rigoli in their open access paper explores the role of power in distributive justice considerations via examination of participant judgments in studies in the USA, Mexico, and South Africa. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2290166 @psychology

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
jeffgreene , to academicchatter
@jeffgreene@mastodon.social avatar

Are you curious whether people evaluate social media content before they “like” it, and that means for learning? Then check out my latest post on “Bemusings” - a Substack where I explain how the science of learning can help people be better learners and workers in the modern digital world.
https://open.substack.com/pub/bemusings/p/you-better-think-while-you-use-social?r=dvmo5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

@edutooters @psychology @academicchatter

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
imperfectcognitions , to philosophy
@imperfectcognitions@mas.to avatar

On the blog today, Dan Degerman writes up a report of a workshop he organised on 'Silence and Psychopathology'. This event also doubled up as a launch event for project EPIC (Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare). @philosophy
https://imperfectcognitions.blogspot.com/2023/12/silence.html

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

@imperfectcognitions @philosophy Thanks a lot. 🤗 Nevertheless, I kind of like silence. The universe and outer space is full of that, why not people, at least sometimes? Silence is not the same as death. Most of all I fear the medicalization of silence(s), which philosophers, of course, do no allow to happen. 😉

jeffgreene , to academicchatter
@jeffgreene@mastodon.social avatar

When college students encounter misinformation on social media, what do they think? And how does this thinking affect their social media behaviors? Could better answers to these questions inform inoculation efforts?We explored these questions in our latest study, published in the Journal of Educational Psychology:
https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2024-30107-001.html

@edutooters @psychology @academicchatter

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
imperfectcognitions , to philosophy
@imperfectcognitions@mas.to avatar

On the blog today, Changsheng Lai challenges the view that successful remembering must be produced by a reliable process. @philosophy
https://imperfectcognitions.blogspot.com/2023/11/remembering-requires-no-reliability.html

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

@imperfectcognitions @philosophy I read that as a scientific philosopher, mainly epistemologist, suffering from AD, and beacuse of that immersed somewhat in neurology, psychology and philosophy of memory.

Does not sound convincing. You pick up exceptions and make a case based on those. Reliability condition supported with some kind of robustness may still be a valid choice.

Also, I'd like to read about the more general epistemological percussions of the proposal. It's easy to rock the boat if you are not one of the rowers. (The article-link shows only the Abstract.)

lisabortolotti , to philosophy
@lisabortolotti@fediscience.org avatar

In this post for the blog I report from a very interesting interdisciplinary symposium on how to address epistemic injustice in and health https://epistemicinjusticeinhealthcareproject.blogspot.com/2023/11/addressing-epistemic-injustice-from.html @ethics @philosophy

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

@lisabortolotti @ethics @philosophy The curiosity contributrion sounds interesting more generally. Too bad busy people seldom have cognitive-emotional space for such.

Eitenberger's part touches personally; with AD I have had to study neurology to get rid of the credibility deficit. AlzForum, e.g., functions as my backrest in interactions with specialists (though I have to write something down in advance).

imperfectcognitions , to philosophy
@imperfectcognitions@mas.to avatar

In today's post Lisa Bortolotti reports from the Reichenau Summer School on how to deal with uncertainty summarising talks ranging from the nature of delusions to the importance of goodbyes http://imperfectcognitions.blogspot.com/2023/11/reichenau-summer-school-dealing-with.html @philosophy

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
cbontenbal , to philosophy Dutch
@cbontenbal@mastodon.social avatar

I find myself not understanding the concept of atheism. Who wants to explain it to me in a coherent way for a beginner? With a metaphysical substantiation please, if that is at all possible.

@philosophy

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

@cbontenbal @philosophy I cannot, but I found the revised SEP-entry on Atheism and Agnosticism by Paul Draper most illuminating and well-written, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar

@EdwardJCornwell @Jakra @spencer @msteenhagen @philosophy @cbontenbal @lack @philippsteinkrueger @Drew I have no original thoughts about colour, but of course SEP has an entry on that, too, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/color/ 🙂

josep_gasol , (edited ) to philosophy
@josep_gasol@mastodon.online avatar

Any bibliographic recommendations where I can find related to ? I am considering writing my master's thesis on this topic starting from Iris Marion Young and incorporating Martha Nussbaum and Tom Regan as possible starting points. Thank you very much 📚 @philosophy

Lupposofi ,
@Lupposofi@mementomori.social avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines