The ruling did not instruct “ Israel to refrain from killing and harming Palestinians in the interim.”, as the article says, instead it only instructed to minimize civilian casualties as much as Israel can, according to the rules of war.
The rule also established that there are some characteristics of current situation described by SA that coincide with some characteristics of genocide, thus establishing disagreement between SA and Israel.
I see the current ruling as fair and actually favorable to Israel, since it does not call to stop war, nor calls the situation genocide.
But of course it does not prevent elements on both sides to claim some sort of victory and blame the other side for various sins and play victim at the same time.