There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Austrian woman is found guilty of fatally infecting her neighbor with COVID-19

A woman in Austria was found guilty of fatally infecting her neighbor with COVID-19 in 2021, her second pandemic-related conviction in a year, according to local media. A judge sentenced the 54-year-old on Thursday to four months’ suspended imprisonment and an 800-euro fine ($886.75) for grossly negligent homicide.

The victim, who was also a cancer patient, died of pneumonia that was caused by the coronavirus, according to Austrian news agency APA. A virological report showed that the virus DNA matched both the deceased and the 54-year-old woman, proving that the defendant “almost 100 percent” transmitted it, an expert told the court.

“I feel sorry for you personally – I think that something like this has probably happened hundreds of times,” the judge said Thursday. “But you are unlucky that an expert has determined with almost absolute certainty that it was an infection that came from you.”

MediaBiasFactChecker Bot ,

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/austria-covid-conviction-court-coronavirus-ef341c5f6714526f05c67662a94eeb13

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

The most relevant part of the article, to me, has not been quoted:

This week, the judge heard statements from the deceased’s family, who said there had been contact in a stairwell between the neighbors on Dec. 21, 2001 — when the defendant would already have known she had COVID-19. But she denied the meeting, saying she was too sick to get out of bed that day. She also said she believed she had bronchitis, which she typically gets every year.

But the woman’s doctor told police that the defendant had tested positive with a rapid test and told him that she “certainly won’t let herself be locked up” after the result.

Seems pretty open-and-shut to me. If she had something like drug-resistant TB, there would be no question here.

Nurse_Robot ,

With that context, 4 months and $800 doesn’t feel like enough

breakingcups ,

Huh, I’m surprised the doctor was allowed to comment on that.

RedWeasel ,

Why? There a limits on health care privacy privilege. Also with regards to with attorneys as well.

todd_bonzalez ,
@todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee avatar

Welcome to a world without medical privacy.

In the USA this wouldn’t happen because we have HIPAA.

We also used to have Roe v. Wade…

fistac0rpse ,

Dec. 21, 2001 - do news sites no longer employ editors or proofreaders?

ulterno ,
@ulterno@lemmy.kde.social avatar

So, unless you die of it, there are no repercussions to someone blatantly coughing at your face, again and again, despite protests.

I don’t feel sorry for anyone doing that.

foggy ,

Coughing deliberately in someones face can be battery in many states with a good lawyer.

ulterno ,
@ulterno@lemmy.kde.social avatar

In India, if I call out someone for coughing in my face, IATA.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines