(The UN does not, in fact, have a âright to defend itselfâ, nor to slaughter Jews in brutal pogroms, nor to teach generations of children that the greatest thing they can do with their lives is detonate a suicide vest in a crowd of Jewish civilians using the money of the international community)
You mean the plan accepted by the Jews and rejected by the Arabs, right before they launched a war which in the words of Haj Amin al-Husseini, Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and close friend of Adolf Hitler, they would âcontinue fighting until the Zionists were annihilatedâ and, in the words of one of the most senior leaders of Jerusalem, Jamal al-Husayni, that âthe blood will flow like rivers in the Middle Eastâ?
Thatâs the war youâre referring to re: âThe UNâs right to defend itselfâ?
Because of course, it could have done at the time, and defended itself against the side that rejected the UN plan: the Arabs. And it didnât.
So whatâs your point here, if not spreading Jew-hatred?
Ah, okay. So you made a laughable claim, I corrected you on it, and youâve pivoted into personal insults.
Great. That sounds about right for the antisemitic left. Par for the course.
Free Palestine from the Jihadis so that the normal people of Palestine can have a state of their own side-by-side with Israel.
EDIT: I donât know why I bothered. Youâre just about to call me a âZionistâ and make some bullshit claims and then run off as if you scored a victory.
Iâm not new here, Iâm just not a coward who forms their opinions based on groupthink and the hysteria of antisemitism, which does not discriminate on left or right biases.
Glad you proved me right though. Reaffirmed how little I think of the pro-Hamas rabble/tribe.
Not much. British Muslims spent the last 10 months attacking British Jews and calling for a genocide of the Jewish people in Israel, burning Union Jacks, calling for âdeath to the Westâ, and so on and so on.
Iâm not saying they should be subject to similar attacks themselves, but Iâm not going to march in their defence.
They could have done that after October 7th, and they chose to celebrate the death of Jews. So Iâm simply not going to march with them at all. Letâs see what happens.
Israel stepped up its accusations in March, saying over 450 UNRWA staff were military operatives in Gaza terrorist groups. UNRWA employs 32,000 people across its area of operations, 13,000 of them in Gaza.
so according to the UN israel was off by a factor of 50, which would make UNRWA 9/13000 = 0.07% of a terrorist organization. since you seem like a zionist, if this is somehow gonna convince me to support israelâs bullshit claims about aid workers in gaza, lmao. lol even.
they did a investigation which discovered findings related to 19 people, one of whom was dismissed and the other 9 were deemed insufficient. it doesnât mean they only investigated 19 people and found 9, it means out of all the allegations only 19 could even be reasonably investigated, and they decided to terminate 9 people.
and by Zionist i meant a supporter of state of Israel (which you seem highly engaged in covering for them) regardless of ideology and politics. this is the most common use of the word by self identified (most of whom are evangelical christians and are zionists for very anti-semetic reasons) and the general public. stop baiting people into the gotcha âanti-semeticâ debate bullshit you disingenuous fuck.
I wonât respond to anything you say because new account posting lie after lie doesnât seem genuine, so go nuts in the replies.
Oh god. I knew it would be this sort of low-IQ shit when I saw your @lemmy.ml address.
they did a investigation which discovered findings related to 19 people, one of whom was dismissed and the other 9 were deemed insufficient. it doesnât mean they only investigated 19 people and found 9, it means out of all the allegations only 19 could even be reasonably investigated, and they decided to terminate 9 people.
They investigated 19 people and found 12 of them were so highly plausibly involved in the October 7th Holocaust, even by the UNâs ridiculous standards which always try to absolve themselves, that they have already fired them. Thatâs it. Theyâre already fired by the UN because of the evidence they uncovered. Theyâve already been fired for it.
and by Zionist i meant a supporter of state of Israel (which you seem highly engaged in covering for them) regardless of ideology and politics
OK, so the idea here appears to be that Israel is unique among all the nations of the world in that it only has a right to exist insofar as one can individually and subjectively support their government. Have I misread this?
this is the most common use of the word by self identified (most of whom are evangelical christians and are zionists for very anti-semetic reasons) and the general public
This isnât true, you just watched it on a YouTube video.
Hereâs an example: Iâm a Zionist because I believe the Jewish people have a right to national self-determination in their ethnic and religious homeland.
Anti-Zionists therefore presumably believe that the Jews have no such right, and therefore their state â uniquely among all the states on the planet, from the United States to Australia â must be destroyed and abolished.
Which bit of that is âincorrectâ in your view, assuming youâre willing/able to activate some element of your prefrontal cortex in responding?
stop baiting people into the gotcha âanti-semeticâ debate bullshit you disingenuous fuck.
I havenât baited anything. I wanted to know what you meant when you labelled me as a âZionistâ, in your own word(s).
Nothing youâve said has convinced me that you wouldnât have been piling up âPro-Zionistâ books on the bonfires of Berlin in 1939.
Reuters - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Reuters:
> MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United Kingdom
> Wikipedia about this source