There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

MonsterMonster ,

Hollow threats. Go.

PrincessLeiasCat ,

Don’t come to the US, please. Go and join your oligarch brethren in Moscow.

QuarterSwede ,
@QuarterSwede@lemmy.world avatar

Lol, first thought I had. My company’s state president is an ex-pat from the UK and “loves America.”

yemmly ,

Tory voters say they prefer Tory government. There’s the real headline.

Rivalarrival ,

Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

ISOmorph ,

I understand the hate, but that’s a very shortsighted wish. How do you tax the rich if they leave?

Gsus4 ,
@Gsus4@mander.xyz avatar

They are harder to tax than anyone else.

nilaus ,

They wont leave, they are just throwing a tantrum.

LifeInMultipleChoice ,

If it is income based taxing: they leave, and the demand is filled by someone else who takes their place.

Easy example: grocery store owner A says I don’t like it, moves. Obviously someone else will open a grocery store there if it is needed. They will be taxed accordingly.

DarkDarkHouse ,
@DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

What if the rich are a blight that create poverty by sucking up the capital?

jonne ,

If their assets are onshore, they’d either have to sell them or be taxed anyway. If their assets are offshore, they probably weren’t paying taxes on them anyway.

JustARaccoon ,

Take their properties (a lot of it being in housing). Not like they can leave with that.

Rivalarrival ,

How are we going to fertilize our gardens if we don’t keep our shit in a bucket next to the toilet?

The value these pieces of shit bring to the table is far less than the damages caused by the exploitative business practices that made them rich. Taxes are not a sufficient justification for keeping them around.

thetreesaysbark ,

*arse

JohnDClay ,

So 53% say they’re less likely to leave after the election? That seems to indicate that the candidates elected were marginally more pro millionaire than the previous ones.

explore_broaden ,

That isn’t included the percentage that didn’t change, because they aren’t interested in picking up and leaving the country just because they don’t like the government.

thetreesaysbark ,

Less likely to leave or it made no difference, I guess.

It could also be that with the previous government only 10% were considering leaving.

Deceptichum ,
@Deceptichum@quokk.au avatar

Interesting because they’d already been leaving under the previous government.

hangonasecond ,

Ah, brexit

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •