There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

NarrativeBear ,

Canadian News agencies are really shooting themselves in the foot here, and then crying about it. This is a perfect example of them wanting their cake and eating it too.

What Canadian News is concerned about is social media platforms are summerizing news content and news articles, this means users/consumers do not need to leave social media platforms (and read articles on the news site directly).

This means news agencies do not get their add revenue on their own news sites. Instead social media sites get this add revenue instead. Thus profiting off content created by news agencies.

Now where it’s really stupid, news agencies also want to prevent social media sites and maybe even search engines from providing links to news sites without paying a fee to the news agencies for doing so.

This would prevent users on sites to follow a link (maybe even posted by a user) to a news site to read a article. Social media sites make no add revenue from linking as it directs users away from their site, but from summarizing articles and keeping users on their site they do.

IMO whoever wrote this law does not understand the internet or how it work. They also fail to realize the internet is inherently built on linking to sites.

I do agreed social media sites like Google/Facebook/twitter/instagram/Lemmy? should pay a fee when summerizing news articles for users especially if these sites benefit from increased add revenue of these articles, but also asking for payment when links are created is going to far.

CaptainAniki ,

“It’s an interesting experience to be editor in chief of a news organization and yet locked out of your own news account and prevented from accessing the great work your teams produce for the platform every day,” Fenlon told Vox in an email.

So you make content directly for instagram and not because you have journalistic integrity and a story to tell?

“It also gave me a real glimpse of what the future might look like if Meta and Google make good on their threats to drop news from their platforms in Canada,” Fenlon said. “Our focus now is to ensure Canadians know where else they can go to get CBC journalism should they be suddenly cut off by Meta or Google, including by raising awareness of our free news app and websites.”

Oh no! I have to do the marketing myself!!! The horror!!!

The new Canadian law is modeled on a controversial Australian law, the News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code, which went into effect in 2021. Google and Meta’s responses to that law were similar threats to pull links, but both companies ended up making payments to some news organizations. The Australian government estimates that news outlets got AU$200 million, although it doesn’t know that for sure — nor does it know how that money was distributed — because the companies were allowed to keep those figures private. Even so, other countries, like Canada, likely assumed they’d get similar results with similar laws and were less apt to take Google and Meta’s threats seriously.

So it actually DOES work?

I fail to see the issue.

BilboBargains ,

Consuming news media is bad for mental health, this move is good news for Canadians.

FarceMultiplier ,
@FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca avatar

Pretty sure we’ll be better than fine.

takeda ,

Oh my! What should I do to get this passed in my state?

schroedingerskoala ,

Oh no, .... anyway ...

sapphiria ,
@sapphiria@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I didn’t know Instagram was Canada’s sole source of news. You learn something new every day.

j4k3 OP ,
@j4k3@lemmy.world avatar

Trying to post content just to help out and keep things going sure is a job for bots that don’t have to deal with responses

sik0fewl ,

There's literally no other source. It's an information desert the entire day.

double_dose_larry ,
@double_dose_larry@fanaticus.social avatar

Trusted news platform Instagram

n3m37h ,

Good news for Lemmy lmfao

moozogew ,

We might have to ban it too if Canada is going to charge the instance owners for every Canadian news story posted

4am ,
@4am@lemmy.world avatar

I don’t think that’s how it works; I thought that it was news aggregators run by the site itself; so like, “Google News” or an official account on an app posting.

Anyway this isn’t going to end well for Canada. This is like owing a newspaper money because you showed someone the way to the newsstand.

i_am_not_a_robot ,

The instance owner shouldn’t be subject to Canadian law if they are not living in or doing business in Canada. Canada would have to block the instances.

moozogew ,

That’s true, only Canadian instances would have to block Canadian news sites

partial_accumen ,

RIP /c/news federated to lemmy.ca :(

Angry_Maple ,
@Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works avatar

But would it be for economic gain?

sik0fewl ,

Lemmy is not turning a profit, so it does not apply.

Lmaydev ,

Do you have a source about what qualifies someone to have to pay? I can’t find much about it online.

sik0fewl ,

https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/pl/charter-charte/c18_1.html

The Bill introduces a new bargaining framework intended to support news businesses to secure fair compensation when their news content is made available by dominant digital news intermediaries and generates economic gain.

Angry_Maple ,
@Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works avatar

“and generates economic gain”

I wonder if this part would be our workaround, since lemmy isn’t like Facebook or reddit in that sense

CaptainAniki ,

Who’s we? I run my own federated instance.

Bonesince1997 ,

Making themselves irrelevant for the win!

wesker ,
@wesker@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

“news” … “content” … both terms used loosely when talking Instagram.

dudebro ,

Yeah, trash article.

But that’s the norm.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •