There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

MimicJar ,

If we’re going to play the snark game, please read my comments completely before replying.

A site being unsupported by Firefox just means it’s a shitty site. If it did support Firefox, but not Opera, would you make claims that Mozilla paid Apple to block Opera?

Additionally supported and functional are two completely different things. Have you tested every single part of the website in Firefox? What about new versions of the site? Did you test them in Firefox?

Additionally, what even is business.apple.com? I can access apple.com from Firefox to buy a phone or iPad. I can access apple.com/business to learn all about their business offerings from Firefox. I can access BusinessConnect.apple.com to manage my business from Firefox.

The fact that some random Apple site doesn’t work in Firefox just proves that Apple is shitty/lazy. The fact that it doesn’t work on a mobile device is the real crazy thing.

There are plenty of reasons to be upset with Google, we may even find negative monopolistic behavior as a result of this lawsuit. However the fact that some Apple site doesn’t support Firefox isn’t proof of that.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines