Ok,.cool? 70% of those don’t apply to this conversation at all.
While I’d disagree strongly on relevance, I’m curious about your justification for ignoring the remainder that clearly shows that megacorps and state actors are not trustworthy with such responsibilities.
Look, it’s clear you’re willing to twist yourself into a pretzel and play whataboutism because you refuse to acknowledge the uncomfortable truth. That’s fine, I get it.
You think that wanting policies and laws claiming to protect children to actually be intended and used to protect children is an uncomfortable truth?
Nearly every aspect of our society relies on the exploitation and suffering of others.
Erm… What? Not sure how this is relevant. Are you saying that you’re in favor of exploitation or laws written in bad faith to increase the suffering of others? That you think that we should not try to work towards a safer and more equitable world? Really not clear.