There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

moody ,

This is what we need AI for. Robots that can independantly handle this type of task that is too dangerous for humans.

Fuck the generative garbage we have now. Work on this stuff instead.

RogueBanana ,

But where’s the money in that?

Flocklesscrow ,

“Our shareholders insist the line must go up!”

GrammarPolice ,

GenAI is getting better and better

BlucifersVeinyAnus ,

Nobody had a faster robot?

Ilandar ,

Why don’t they use humans like the Soviets? Are they stupid?

nyan ,

The Soviets never sent humans into the reactor to remove melted core material. The remains of the Chernobyl No. 4 core are still there inside the sarcophagus, and I don’t think anyone was making serious plans to remove them even before the Ukraine war got in the way.

(The job that got so many Soviet workers exposed was moving solid radioactive debris from the exploded core so that the initial containment sarcophagus could be built and the other three reactors on the site restarted. Nothing comparable was required at Fukushima because the explosions there didn’t breach any of the cores, thus no chunks of highly radioactive graphite to shovel off the roofs. I understand that the Soviets did try robots, but radiation isn’t good for electronics and, well, it was Soviet equipment in 1986—they just weren’t very effective.)

KingThrillgore , (edited )
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

Because they’re going to use specialized cranes to pull that shit out and bury it over the next 100 years (special military operation pending). It was installed with the New Safe Confinement. The entire point of the NSC was to protect the site from disturbance and collapse while they waited for it to be safe enough to disassemble the plant.

FergleFFergleson ,

It could take a century

Maybe we should chip in and buy a second robot.

sawdustprophet ,
@sawdustprophet@midwest.social avatar

Maybe we should chip in and buy a second robot.

Hear me out: three robots.

FantasmaNaCasca ,

With more than one, a union can be formed. So, no.

lud ,

The union would be extremely powerful with just one robot though. There would be no competition or different opinions. If the single robot strikes to get better working conditions or better pay, the entire workforce is on strike.

sbv ,

yes yes, but the robot cannot strike, you see, because one robot must make the strike motion, another robot must second the strike motion, and then all the robots must vote. if there is no robot to second the strike motion, then no robots may vote, meaning the strike cannot pass.

KingThrillgore ,
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

It may take a century not because of robot costs, but because the materials haven’t decayed enough to store in a dry cask.

schmorpel ,

Wall-E, is that you?

LiveLM ,

Such a fantastic movie, I need to watch it again

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •