There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

JWBananas ,
@JWBananas@lemmy.world avatar

Moving down the stack, Unix systems have never been big on supporting arbitrary drivers: remember that Unix systems were typically coupled to specific machines and vendors. NT, on the other hand, intended to be an OS for “any” machine and was sold by a software company, so supporting drivers written by others was critical. As a result, NT came with the Network Driver Interface Specification (NDIS), an abstraction to support network card drivers with ease. To this day, manufacturer-supplied drivers are just not a thing on Linux, which leads to interesting contraptions like the ndiswrapper, a very popular shim in the early 2000s to be able to reuse Windows drivers for WiFi cards on Linux.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/05fd74ac-834c-45e0-acd0-ddc6ede11ccb.jpeg

InverseParallax ,
NeoNachtwaechter ,

Unix? Come on, really?

What is Unix in 2024?

anon5621 ,
@anon5621@lemmy.ml avatar

I think any modern unix-like operation systems: bsd based,linux based,haiku,minix and other else hundred branches.

Kerb ,
@Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

dont forget darwin aka MacOS

qprimed , (edited )
  • preps for bed
  • starts closing apps
  • refreshes lemmy…

Windows NT vs. Unix: A design comparison

  • sigh

edit: back. a really enjoyable read. loved the POV as unix guy poking at NT. g’night for real now, lemmy.

Plopp ,

Right?

sigh

unzips

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines